Hopkins Nick, Kahani-Hopkins Vered
Department of Psychology, Dundee University, Scotland, UK.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2006 Jun;45(Pt 2):245-64. doi: 10.1348/014466605X48583.
Much research in intergroup relations concerns the potential for interventions (e.g. intergroup contact) to reduce majorities' discrimination against minorities. In this paper we focus on how minority group members construe such interventions, especially as they affect their abilities to act in terms of their collective identity to realize social change. In addressing this issue, we focus on a minority's beliefs and theories concerning the intergroup dynamics lying behind their marginalization. Our data are qualitative and concern British Muslims' analyses of the dynamics of Islamophobia. Specifically, we explore two theorizations of Muslims' marginalization. Both share a concern with improving Muslims' collective position in Britain. However, they construe the dynamics to Islamophobia in very different ways, and this shapes their approach to intergroup contact and dialogue. Our analysis is informed by, and seeks to complement, social psychological theorizing on social change and intergroup contact.
许多关于群体间关系的研究关注干预措施(如群体间接触)减少多数群体对少数群体歧视的可能性。在本文中,我们关注少数群体成员如何理解此类干预措施,特别是当这些措施影响到他们根据集体身份采取行动以实现社会变革的能力时。在解决这个问题时,我们关注少数群体关于导致他们被边缘化的群体间动态的信念和理论。我们的数据是定性的,涉及英国穆斯林对伊斯兰恐惧症动态的分析。具体来说,我们探讨了穆斯林被边缘化的两种理论。两者都关注改善穆斯林在英国的集体地位。然而,它们以非常不同的方式解释导致伊斯兰恐惧症的动态,这塑造了他们对群体间接触和对话的态度。我们的分析以关于社会变革和群体间接触的社会心理学理论为依据,并力求对其进行补充。