Suppr超能文献

双股绳肌腱移植重建前交叉韧带时不同股骨固定装置的比较:生物力学分析

Comparison between different femoral fixation devices for ACL reconstruction with doubled hamstring tendon graft: a biomechanical analysis.

作者信息

Milano Giuseppe, Mulas Pier Damiano, Ziranu Fabio, Piras Stefano, Manunta Andrea, Fabbriciani Carlo

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2006 Jun;22(6):660-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.082.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to compare the mechanical behavior of some devices used for femoral fixation of doubled hamstring tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction when included in a graft fixation complex (GFC).

METHODS

An ACL reconstruction was performed on 90 porcine knees. The graft used was the doubled lateral extensor of toes (DLET). Nine different femoral fixation devices were tested and classified according to their fixation mechanism: compression (Bioscrew and RCI screw); expansion (Rigidfix); cortical suspension (Ligament Anchor, EndoButton-CL, and Swing Bridge); cancellous suspension (Linx-HT); and cortical-cancellous suspension (Transfix and Bio-Transfix). All GFC were subjected to a cyclic loading test, then to a load-to-failure test. Graft elongation after 1,000 load cycles, failure load, and stiffness were calculated for each device.

RESULTS

Regarding graft elongation, Bioscrew and RCI screws showed the highest mean values. All the other GFC showed no significant differences between them when delta elongation (elongation(1,000 cycles) - elongation(20 cycles)) was considered. For failure load, the highest mean values were observed for Bio-Transfix, Transfix, and Swing Bridge; a homogeneous subset with the lowest mean values was formed by Ligament Anchor, RCI screw, Bioscrew, and Linx-HT. For stiffness, the greatest values were observed for Bio-Transfix, Transfix, and Swing Bridge; all other groups showed no significant differences between them.

CONCLUSIONS

Cortical-cancellous suspension fixation seemed to offer the best and most predictable results in terms of elongation, fixation strength, and stiffness. For both compression and suspension, the weakest fixation was attained with cancellous fixation devices. Cortical suspension devices showed a greatly variable mechanical behavior, according to their design.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Transcondylar devices offer the best structural properties for femoral fixation of doubled hamstring tendon graft in ACL reconstruction.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较用于前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中双股绳肌腱移植股骨固定的一些装置,当它们包含在移植固定复合体(GFC)中时的力学行为。

方法

对90个猪膝关节进行ACL重建。使用的移植材料是双股外侧趾伸肌(DLET)。测试了9种不同的股骨固定装置,并根据其固定机制进行分类:加压(生物螺钉和RCI螺钉);扩张(Rigidfix);皮质悬吊(韧带锚钉、EndoButton-CL和Swing Bridge);松质骨悬吊(Linx-HT);以及皮质-松质骨悬吊(Transfix和Bio-Transfix)。所有GFC都进行了循环加载试验,然后进行破坏载荷试验。计算每个装置在1000次加载循环后的移植伸长、破坏载荷和刚度。

结果

关于移植伸长,生物螺钉和RCI螺钉显示出最高的平均值。当考虑伸长增量(伸长(1000次循环)-伸长(20次循环))时,所有其他GFC之间没有显著差异。对于破坏载荷,Bio-Transfix、Transfix和Swing Bridge观察到最高的平均值;韧带锚钉、RCI螺钉、生物螺钉和Linx-HT形成了平均值最低的同质子集。对于刚度,Bio-Transfix、Transfix和Swing Bridge观察到最大值;所有其他组之间没有显著差异。

结论

皮质-松质骨悬吊固定在伸长、固定强度和刚度方面似乎提供了最好和最可预测的结果。对于加压和悬吊,松质骨固定装置的固定最弱。皮质悬吊装置根据其设计显示出很大的力学行为差异。

临床意义

髁间装置为ACL重建中双股绳肌腱移植的股骨固定提供了最佳的结构性能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验