• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较药物治疗与手术治疗流产的疗效及患者满意度的随机研究。

A randomized study comparing efficacy and patient satisfaction in medical or surgical treatment of miscarriage.

作者信息

Niinimäki Maarit, Jouppila Pentti, Martikainen Hannu, Talvensaari-Mattila Anne

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2006 Aug;86(2):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.072. Epub 2006 Jun 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.072
PMID:16764872
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of the medical treatment to surgical uterine evacuation and patient satisfaction in each group.

DESIGN

A randomized, controlled study.

SETTING

An outpatient clinic in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics in Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.

PATIENT(S): Ninety-eight eligible women who had had miscarriages.

INTERVENTION(S): Medical treatment of miscarriage (n = 49) with 200 mg of mifepristone and 0.8 mg of misoprostol 1-3 days after the event or surgical uterine evacuation (n = 49). Questionnaires to collect data of experienced pain and patient satisfaction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The complete abortion rate with the primary treatment (primary outcome) and the patient satisfaction (secondary outcome).

RESULT(S): The success rate was equal (100% in surgical and 90% in medical group). More infections were diagnosed in the surgical group. Surgically treated patients were more satisfied with the treatment (100% vs. 88%). Medical treatment was considered more painful and fewer patients (70% vs. 91%) would choose the medical method in the future.

CONCLUSION(S): Medical treatment is an effective alternative to surgical treatment and increases the choice available to women. Surgical treatment is associated with more infections. More medically treated patients experienced pain and dissatisfaction.

摘要

目的

比较药物治疗与手术清宫的疗效以及每组患者的满意度。

设计

一项随机对照研究。

地点

芬兰奥卢大学医院妇产科门诊。

患者

98例符合条件的流产女性。

干预措施

流产后1 - 3天采用200毫克米非司酮和0.8毫克米索前列醇进行药物流产治疗(n = 49)或手术清宫(n = 49)。通过问卷调查收集疼痛体验和患者满意度数据。

主要观察指标

初始治疗的完全流产率(主要指标)和患者满意度(次要指标)。

结果

成功率相同(手术组为100%,药物组为90%)。手术组诊断出更多感染病例。接受手术治疗的患者对治疗更满意(100%对88%)。药物治疗被认为更疼痛,未来选择药物治疗方法的患者更少(70%对91%)。

结论

药物治疗是手术治疗的有效替代方法,增加了女性的选择。手术治疗与更多感染相关。更多接受药物治疗的患者经历了疼痛和不满。

相似文献

1
A randomized study comparing efficacy and patient satisfaction in medical or surgical treatment of miscarriage.一项比较药物治疗与手术治疗流产的疗效及患者满意度的随机研究。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Aug;86(2):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.072. Epub 2006 Jun 9.
2
Expectant, medical, or surgical management of first-trimester miscarriage: a meta-analysis.孕早期流产的期待治疗、药物治疗或手术治疗:一项荟萃分析。
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;105(5 Pt 1):1104-13. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000158857.44046.a4.
3
Treating miscarriages: a randomised study of cost-effectiveness in medical or surgical choice.治疗流产:关于医疗或手术选择成本效益的随机研究。
BJOG. 2009 Jun;116(7):984-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02161.x. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
4
Randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of same-day administration of mifepristone and misoprostol for termination of pregnancy with the standard 36 to 48 hour protocol.一项随机对照试验,比较米非司酮与米索前列醇同日给药用于终止妊娠的疗效与标准的36至48小时方案。
BJOG. 2007 Feb;114(2):207-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01179.x.
5
Acceptability of suction curettage and mifepristone abortion in the United States: a prospective comparison study.美国吸刮术和米非司酮流产的可接受性:一项前瞻性比较研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jun;182(6):1292-9. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.106183.
6
The use of misoprostol for early pregnancy failure.米索前列醇在早期妊娠失败中的应用。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;18(6):581-6. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32800feedb.
7
Randomized outpatient clinical trial of medical evacuation and surgical curettage in incomplete miscarriage.不全流产中医疗后送与手术刮宫的随机门诊临床试验。
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2001 Sep;6(3):141-4.
8
Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in Norway.挪威使用米非司酮和米索前列醇进行早期妊娠终止。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Nov;80(11):1056-61.
9
Immediate versus delayed medical treatment for first-trimester miscarriage: a randomized trial.即刻与延迟治疗早期流产的随机试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;206(3):215.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.009. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
10
Preference and acceptability of oral versus vaginal administration of misoprostol in medical abortion with mifepristone.米索前列醇经口服与经阴道给药在与米非司酮联合用于药物流产时的偏好性及可接受性
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 Nov 1;123(1):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.02.019.

引用本文的文献

1
Miscarriage treatment-related adverse events: A nationwide registry study from Finland.流产治疗相关不良事件:一项来自芬兰的全国性登记研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Sep;104(9):1720-1730. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15174. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
2
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of surgical versus medical method for first trimester pregnancy termination in Iran: A quasi-experimental research.伊朗早期妊娠终止手术与药物方法临床疗效比较:一项准实验研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Apr 28;12:132. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_582_22. eCollection 2023.
3
Economic evaluation of a randomized controlled trial comparing mifepristone and misoprostol with misoprostol alone in the treatment of early pregnancy loss.
米非司酮和米索前列醇与单独使用米索前列醇治疗早期妊娠丢失的随机对照试验的经济学评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0262894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262894. eCollection 2022.
4
Diagnostic criteria for retained products of conception-A scoping review.保留性妊娠产物的诊断标准:范围综述。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Dec;100(12):2135-2143. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14229. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
5
Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis.流产管理方法:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):CD012602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012602.pub2.
6
Mifepristone followed by misoprostol compared with placebo followed by misoprostol as medical treatment for early pregnancy loss (the Triple M trial): A double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial.米非司酮序贯米索前列醇与安慰剂序贯米索前列醇作为早期妊娠丢失的药物治疗比较(三联M试验):一项双盲安慰剂对照随机试验
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jan 6;32:100716. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100716. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
Mifepristone and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for uterine evacuation after early pregnancy failure: study protocol for a randomized double blinded placebo-controlled comparison (Triple M Trial).米非司酮联合米索前列醇与单独应用米索前列醇用于早孕失败后清宫术的随机双盲安慰剂对照比较研究方案(Triple M 试验)。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):443. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2497-y.
8
Medical treatment for early fetal death (less than 24 weeks).早期胎儿死亡(小于24周)的医学治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD002253. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002253.pub4.
9
Randomised Trial of Oral Misoprostol Versus Manual Vacuum Aspiration for the Treatment of Incomplete Abortion at a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital.尼日利亚一家三级医院口服米索前列醇与手动真空吸引术治疗不全流产的随机试验
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2019 Feb;19(1):e38-e43. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2019.19.01.008. Epub 2019 May 30.
10
Medical treatments for incomplete miscarriage.不完全流产的医学治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 31;1(1):CD007223. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007223.pub4.