Suppr超能文献

紧张型头痛的自生训练:对照试验的系统评价

Autogenic training for tension type headaches: a systematic review of controlled trials.

作者信息

Kanji N, White A R, Ernst E

机构信息

Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Health Studies, Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, Chalfont St Giles, Buckinghamshire HP8 4AD, UK.

出版信息

Complement Ther Med. 2006 Jun;14(2):144-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2006.03.001. Epub 2006 May 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine from the published evidence whether autogenic training as sole therapy is effective for prevention of tension-type headaches in adults.

METHOD

Systematic review of controlled trials. Literature searches were performed in January 2005 in six major databases, specifically Medline, EMBASE, AMED, CENTRAL, PsychInfo and CINAHL and information was extracted and evaluated in a pre-defined manner.

RESULTS

Seven controlled clinical trials were included in the review. The methodological quality of these studies was low. Patient samples were generally representative of the more severely affected cases. None of the studies show autogenic training to be convincingly superior to other interventions care. Some trials suggested that the effect of autogenic training is no different from hypnosis and inferior to biofeedback.

CONCLUSION

There is no consistent evidence to suggest that autogenic training is superior to other interventions for prevention of tension headaches, or different from other forms of relaxation. Further studies should investigate the use of standard autogenic training in patients with moderate headache.

摘要

目的

根据已发表的证据,确定自生训练作为单一疗法对预防成人紧张型头痛是否有效。

方法

对对照试验进行系统评价。2005年1月在六个主要数据库(即医学索引数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库、联合和补充医学数据库、考克兰系统评价数据库、心理学文摘数据库和护理学与健康领域数据库)中进行文献检索,并以预先定义的方式提取和评估信息。

结果

该评价纳入了七项对照临床试验。这些研究的方法学质量较低。患者样本通常代表受影响更严重的病例。没有一项研究表明自生训练明显优于其他干预措施。一些试验表明,自生训练的效果与催眠无异,且不如生物反馈。

结论

没有一致的证据表明自生训练在预防紧张性头痛方面优于其他干预措施,或与其他形式的放松方法有差异。进一步的研究应调查标准自生训练在中度头痛患者中的应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验