Talmi Deborah, Goshen-Gottstein Yonatan
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Memory. 2006 May;14(4):424-36. doi: 10.1080/09658210500426623.
Three classes of theories explain the recency effect: the modal model, single-store models, and the composite view, which integrates the two positions. None could explain the absence of a long-term recency effect in recognition memory in previous studies. We suggest that prior work did not obtain a recency effect because testing used a multiple-probe rather than a single-probe recognition procedure. Here we tested memory using a single-probe recognition procedure. Experimental conditions included an immediate test, a delayed test after a filled interval, and a continuous-distractor paradigm in which the same filled delay preceded the first word and followed every study word. The long-term recency effect in continuous-distractor recognition was equivalent to the recency effect in immediate recognition. Its absence in the delayed recognition condition demonstrated that it was not attributed to the use of a putative short-term memory store. Single-store models and the composite view can account for this novel finding.
模态模型、单存储模型以及整合了这两种观点的综合观点。以往的研究中,没有一种理论能够解释识别记忆中不存在长期近因效应的现象。我们认为,之前的研究没有获得近因效应,是因为测试采用的是多探针而非单探针识别程序。在此,我们使用单探针识别程序对记忆进行了测试。实验条件包括即时测试、填充间隔后的延迟测试以及连续干扰范式,在连续干扰范式中,相同的填充延迟出现在第一个单词之前,并跟随每个学习单词之后。连续干扰识别中的长期近因效应与即时识别中的近因效应相当。在延迟识别条件下不存在这种效应,这表明它并非归因于假定的短期记忆存储的使用。单存储模型和综合观点可以解释这一新发现。