• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于全科牙医对转诊患者首次就诊后收到的医院专科医生回复信看法的调查。

A survey of general dental practitioners' opinions of response letters received from hospital specialists following a referred patient's first appointment.

作者信息

Tomlinson P, McAndrew R

机构信息

University Dental Hospital Cardiff, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XY.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 2006 Jun 10;200(11):621-3; discussion 617. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813641.

DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.4813641
PMID:16767140
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To discover what dentists require of a hospital response letter with regards to content and timeliness.

DESIGN

Postal survey.

SETTING

South Wales.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A postal questionnaire was issued to all dentists (n = 256) who had referred a patient to the dental hospital between 1 January 2003 and 1 March 2003.

RESULTS

The response rate was 60.2% (154). The preferred time frame for the receipt of a letter following a patient's appointment was one to three weeks for 96.4% (n = 133) of respondents, but 58.4% believed that they currently do not receive responses within this time frame. The preferred method of communication remained the letter (n = 82, 53%), followed by the telephone (n = 58, 38%). E-mail accounted for eight percent (n = 12) of communication. Most respondents (70%, n = 107) were satisfied with the letters' content. Eight of the ten items of information suggested as being appropriate in a response letter were considered essential by 53.2% of dentists (n = 82), and 55.8% (n = 76) believed the remaining two items to be desirable.

CONCLUSIONS

Dentists agree closely on the information required in a response letter and most are satisfied with the content of current response letters. However, many dentists believe response letters arrive later than three weeks after their patient's appointment.

摘要

目的

了解牙医对于医院回复信在内容和及时性方面的要求。

设计

邮寄调查。

地点

南威尔士。

研究对象与方法

向2003年1月1日至2003年3月1日期间将患者转诊至牙科医院的所有牙医(n = 256)发放邮寄问卷。

结果

回复率为60.2%(154份)。96.4%(n = 133)的受访者认为患者预约后收到信件的最佳时间范围是一至三周,但58.4%的人认为他们目前在此时间范围内未收到回复。首选的沟通方式仍然是信件(n = 82,53%),其次是电话(n = 58,38%)。电子邮件占沟通方式的8%(n = 12)。大多数受访者(70%,n = 107)对信件内容满意。53.2%的牙医(n = 82)认为回复信中建议的十项信息中的八项是必不可少的,55.8%(n = 76)的人认为其余两项是可取的。

结论

牙医在回复信所需信息方面意见高度一致,大多数人对当前回复信的内容满意。然而,许多牙医认为回复信在患者预约三周后才到达。

相似文献

1
A survey of general dental practitioners' opinions of response letters received from hospital specialists following a referred patient's first appointment.一项关于全科牙医对转诊患者首次就诊后收到的医院专科医生回复信看法的调查。
Br Dent J. 2006 Jun 10;200(11):621-3; discussion 617. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813641.
2
An audit of the standard of response letters sent by hospital specialists to general dental practitioners following a referred patient's first appointment.对医院专科医生在转诊患者首次就诊后发给普通牙科医生的回复信标准的审核。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005 Jul;87(4):251-4. doi: 10.1308/1478708051775.
3
Impact of general practitioners' referral letters to an emergency department.全科医生转诊信对急诊科的影响。
Aust Fam Physician. 1994 Jul;23(7):1320-1, 1324-5, 1328.
4
Quality of written reports provided by consultants in restorative dentistry to referring general dental practitioners in the west midlands.西米德兰兹地区修复牙科顾问向转诊的普通牙科从业者提供的书面报告质量。
Prim Dent Care. 2006 Apr;13(2):63-9. doi: 10.1308/135576106776337841.
5
Reply letters following orthodontic consultations: an audit of Merseyside general dental practitioners' satisfaction.正畸咨询后的回复信件:默西塞德郡普通牙科医生满意度审计
Prim Dent Care. 2007 Apr;14(2):53-8. doi: 10.1308/135576107780556789.
6
Prospective assessment of patient directed outpatient communication from a patient and general practitioner perspective.患者和全科医生视角下的患者导向门诊沟通的前瞻性评估。
Postgrad Med J. 2009 Aug;85(1006):395-8. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.068601.
7
Survey of Australian emergency physicians' expectations of general practitioner referrals.澳大利亚急诊医生对全科医生转诊期望的调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Jul;43(372):277-80.
8
Referral letters in oral medicine: standard versus non-standard letters.口腔医学中的转诊信:标准信与非标准信。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Oct;31(5):537-43. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0277.
9
From emergency department to general practitioner: evaluating emergency department communication and service to general practitioners.从急诊科到全科医生:评估急诊科与全科医生之间的沟通及服务情况
Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Aug;19(4):346-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00983.x.
10
Peer review amongst restorative specialists on the quality of their communication with referring dental practitioners.修复专科医生之间就他们与转诊牙医沟通质量进行的同行评审。
Br Dent J. 2003 Oct 11;195(7):389-93; discussion 383. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4810564.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral neglect as a marker of broader neglect: a cross-sectional investigation of orodental consultation letter of leukemic admitted patients in Iran.口腔忽视作为广泛忽视的标志:伊朗白血病入院患者口腔牙科会诊信的横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01775-x.