Tomlinson P, McAndrew R
University Dental Hospital Cardiff, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4XY.
Br Dent J. 2006 Jun 10;200(11):621-3; discussion 617. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813641.
To discover what dentists require of a hospital response letter with regards to content and timeliness.
Postal survey.
South Wales.
A postal questionnaire was issued to all dentists (n = 256) who had referred a patient to the dental hospital between 1 January 2003 and 1 March 2003.
The response rate was 60.2% (154). The preferred time frame for the receipt of a letter following a patient's appointment was one to three weeks for 96.4% (n = 133) of respondents, but 58.4% believed that they currently do not receive responses within this time frame. The preferred method of communication remained the letter (n = 82, 53%), followed by the telephone (n = 58, 38%). E-mail accounted for eight percent (n = 12) of communication. Most respondents (70%, n = 107) were satisfied with the letters' content. Eight of the ten items of information suggested as being appropriate in a response letter were considered essential by 53.2% of dentists (n = 82), and 55.8% (n = 76) believed the remaining two items to be desirable.
Dentists agree closely on the information required in a response letter and most are satisfied with the content of current response letters. However, many dentists believe response letters arrive later than three weeks after their patient's appointment.
了解牙医对于医院回复信在内容和及时性方面的要求。
邮寄调查。
南威尔士。
向2003年1月1日至2003年3月1日期间将患者转诊至牙科医院的所有牙医(n = 256)发放邮寄问卷。
回复率为60.2%(154份)。96.4%(n = 133)的受访者认为患者预约后收到信件的最佳时间范围是一至三周,但58.4%的人认为他们目前在此时间范围内未收到回复。首选的沟通方式仍然是信件(n = 82,53%),其次是电话(n = 58,38%)。电子邮件占沟通方式的8%(n = 12)。大多数受访者(70%,n = 107)对信件内容满意。53.2%的牙医(n = 82)认为回复信中建议的十项信息中的八项是必不可少的,55.8%(n = 76)的人认为其余两项是可取的。
牙医在回复信所需信息方面意见高度一致,大多数人对当前回复信的内容满意。然而,许多牙医认为回复信在患者预约三周后才到达。