Guy Laura S, Douglas Kevin S
Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Psychol Assess. 2006 Jun;18(2):225-30. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.225.
The correspondence between the Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV; S. D. Hart, D. N. Cox, & R. D. Hare, 1995) and the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; R. D. Hare, 1991, 2003) was examined in forensic (N = 175) and correctional (N = 188) samples. Intermeasure correlations for Total scores (.95 forensic, .94 correctional) and the original 2-factor, D. J. Cooke and C. Michie's (2001) 3-factor, and R. D. Hare's (2003) 4-facet models (range = .87-.95) were high. Area under the curve values for the PCL:SV were .98 in both samples (cutoff = PCL-R Total score of 25). The PCL:SV performed well as a screen, maximizing false positive relative to false negative errors. Close correlations for prediction of violent recidivism in the correctional sample were obtained for the PCL-R (.42) and PCL:SV (.37). Results indicate the robust relation between the measures is maintained whether they are completed on the basis of file review only or file plus interview and whether the same or different raters score the measures.
在法医样本(N = 175)和惩教样本(N = 188)中,对《哈雷精神病态检查表:筛查版》(PCL:SV;S.D.哈特、D.N.考克斯和R.D.哈雷,1995年)与《哈雷精神病态检查表修订版》(PCL-R;R.D.哈雷,1991年、2003年)之间的对应关系进行了检验。总分的测量间相关性(法医样本中为.95,惩教样本中为.94)以及原始的双因素模型、D.J.库克和C.米基(2001年)的三因素模型和R.D.哈雷(2003年)的四方面模型(范围为.87-.95)都很高。在两个样本中,PCL:SV的曲线下面积值均为.98(临界值为PCL-R总分25分)。PCL:SV作为一种筛查工具表现良好,相对于假阴性错误,能使假阳性最大化。在惩教样本中,PCL-R(.42)和PCL:SV(.37)在预测暴力再犯方面具有密切相关性。结果表明,无论这些测量是仅基于档案审查完成,还是基于档案加面谈完成,以及评分者是否相同,这些测量之间的稳健关系都能保持。