Steindler Dennis A
The Evelyn F. and William L. McKnight Brain Institute, The University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Brain Pathol. 2006 Apr;16(2):169-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2006.00011.x.
Stem cell biology has provided constant alteration if not reversal of dogma related to the understanding of the behaviors of primitive and dynamic cells. This review summarizes recent findings on dynamic changes of phenotype that accompany the in vitro growth and differentiation of not only stem and progenitor cells, but also differentiated cells derived from a variety of normal and pathological tissues. As there are examples of apparent dedifferentiation and transdifferentiation of neural cells that appear to be terminally differentiated, there is a need to reconsider elements of cellular fate choice that have relevance to neurooncology and neural repair. Recent findings of dynamic behaviors and mixed phenotype of both normal and cancer stem cells suggest that some of the diverse lineage attributes of different solid tumors may owe their existence to dynamic cellular phenotypy gone awry.
干细胞生物学即便没有颠覆,也不断改变了与原始和动态细胞行为理解相关的教条。本综述总结了近期的研究发现,这些发现涉及不仅干细胞和祖细胞,还有源自各种正常和病理组织的分化细胞在体外生长和分化过程中伴随的表型动态变化。由于存在看似终末分化的神经细胞出现明显去分化和转分化的例子,因此有必要重新考虑与神经肿瘤学和神经修复相关的细胞命运选择因素。正常和癌症干细胞的动态行为及混合表型的近期发现表明,不同实体瘤的一些多样谱系特征可能归因于细胞动态表型出现紊乱。