Shupak N M, McKay Julia C, Nielson Warren R, Rollman Gary B, Prato Frank S, Thomas Alex W
Lawson Health Research Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario N6A 4V2.
Pain Res Manag. 2006 Summer;11(2):85-90. doi: 10.1155/2006/842162.
BACKGROUND: Specific pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) have been shown to induce analgesia (antinociception) in snails, rodents and healthy human volunteers. OBJECTIVE: The effect of specific PEMF exposure on pain and anxiety ratings was investigated in two patient populations. DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled parallel design was used. METHOD: The present study investigated the effects of an acute 30 min magnetic field exposure (less than or equal to 400 microTpk; less than 3 kHz) on pain (McGill Pain Questionnaire [MPQ], visual analogue scale [VAS]) and anxiety (VAS) ratings in female rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n=13; mean age 52 years) and fibromyalgia (FM) patients (n=18; mean age 51 years) who received either the PEMF or sham exposure treatment. RESULTS: A repeated measures analysis revealed a significant pre-post-testing by condition interaction for the MPQ Pain Rating Index total for the RA patients, F(1,11)=5.09, P<0.05, estimate of effect size = 0.32, power = 0.54. A significant pre-post-effect for the same variable was present for the FM patients, F(1,15)=16.2, P<0.01, estimate of effect size = 0.52, power =0.96. Similar findings were found for MPQ subcomponents and the VAS (pain). There was no significant reduction in VAS anxiety ratings pre- to post-exposure for either the RA or FM patients. CONCLUSION: These findings provide some initial support for the use of PEMF exposure in reducing pain in chronic pain populations and warrants continued investigation into the use of PEMF exposure for short-term pain relief.
背景:特定的脉冲电磁场(PEMFs)已被证明可在蜗牛、啮齿动物和健康人类志愿者中诱导镇痛(抗伤害感受)。 目的:在两类患者群体中研究特定PEMF暴露对疼痛和焦虑评分的影响。 设计:采用双盲、随机、安慰剂对照平行设计。 方法:本研究调查了急性30分钟磁场暴露(小于或等于400微特斯拉峰值;小于3千赫兹)对女性类风湿性关节炎(RA)(n = 13;平均年龄52岁)和纤维肌痛(FM)患者(n = 18;平均年龄51岁)疼痛(麦吉尔疼痛问卷[MPQ]、视觉模拟量表[VAS])和焦虑(VAS)评分的影响,这些患者接受了PEMF或假暴露治疗。 结果:重复测量分析显示,RA患者的MPQ疼痛评分指数总分在测试前后存在显著的条件交互作用,F(1,11)=5.09,P<0.05,效应大小估计值 = 0.32,检验效能 = 0.54。FM患者的同一变量在测试前后有显著效应,F(1,15)=16.2,P<0.01,效应大小估计值 = 0.52,检验效能 = 0.96。MPQ子成分和VAS(疼痛)也有类似发现。RA或FM患者暴露前后VAS焦虑评分均无显著降低。 结论:这些发现为使用PEMF暴露减轻慢性疼痛人群的疼痛提供了一些初步支持,值得继续研究PEMF暴露用于短期疼痛缓解的情况。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 1999-10
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020-5-18
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2019-10-31
Bioelectromagnetics. 2004-4
Am J Psychiatry. 2004-1