Sandström Ulla, Axelsson Runo, Stålsby Cecilia
The Purchasing Office - Health care, Box 6909, SE-102 39 Stockholm, Sweden.
Int J Integr Care. 2004;4:e15. doi: 10.5334/ijic.112. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
The aim was to study variation in views on long-term goals expressed by members in a project concerning rehabilitation of individuals in an area in mid Sweden. The organisations participating were the municipal social services, the county council's health care organisation, the governmental social insurance office, the national employment service and the national labour market institute.
A number of different meanings of the concept of integration are accounted for and the background of inter-organisational rehabilitation in Sweden is described.
Qualitative interviews using a semi-structured interview guide with altogether 20 leading representatives of the various organisations, all members of the Steering Committee of the project. The analysis consisted of two parts: an in-depth analysis using a phenomenographically inspired approach and qualitative content analysis.
Two main views regarding the goal of inter-organisational integration were identified in the in-depth analysis: Category A, which regards integration as a new approach to rehabilitation, and Category B, which regards integration as a way of rendering the existing organisations more efficient. The content analysis showed a wide variation in spontaneously mentioned topics e.g. on the task of the group.
There exists a risk that divergent views in the Steering Committee concerning the future direction of the collaboration may send mixed messages providing uneven support for the professionals within the different organisations. The study points to the importance of having a common vision and common, well-defined goals at the outset of a collaborative project in order to support micro-level cooperation.
旨在研究瑞典中部某地区一个针对个体康复的项目中,各成员对长期目标的看法差异。参与的组织有市社会服务部门、郡议会的医疗保健组织、政府社会保险办公室、国家就业服务机构以及国家劳动力市场研究所。
阐述了整合概念的多种不同含义,并描述了瑞典组织间康复的背景。
采用半结构化访谈指南进行定性访谈,共采访了各组织的20名主要代表,他们均为该项目指导委员会的成员。分析包括两个部分:运用现象学启发式方法进行深入分析以及定性内容分析。
深入分析确定了关于组织间整合目标的两种主要观点:A类观点将整合视为康复的一种新方法,B类观点将整合视为提高现有组织效率的一种方式。内容分析表明,在自发提及的话题(如小组任务)方面存在很大差异。
指导委员会中对于合作未来方向存在不同观点,这可能会传递出混杂的信息,为不同组织内的专业人员提供不均衡的支持。该研究指出,在合作项目开始时拥有共同愿景和共同的、明确界定的目标对于支持微观层面的合作至关重要。