• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

侧向循环加载下外六角种植体系统基台的旋转位移

Abutment rotational displacement of external hexagon implant system under lateral cyclic loading.

作者信息

Khraisat Ameen, Baqain Zaid H, Smadi Leena, Nomura Shuichi, Miyakawa Osamu, Elnasser Ziad

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(2):96-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00006.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00006.x
PMID:16774595
Abstract

PURPOSE

This in vitro study investigated the effect of lateral cyclic loading with different load positions and periods on abutment rotational displacement (RD) of external hexagon implant system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four groups of five implant assemblies each were used. Each assembly consisted of Brånemark System Mk IV implant (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden), CeraOne abutment (Nobel Biocare AB), and a cement-retained casting. A cyclic load of 50 N was applied centrally and perpendicular to the long axis of the implant for groups A and B for 0.25 and 0.50 x 10(6) cycles, respectively, while for groups C and D, the same load was applied at 4-mm distance eccentrically for 0.25 and 0.50 x 10(6) cycles, respectively. The displacement was evaluated by hand drawing a longitudinal line across the implant-abutment interface. Before and after loading, the lateral distance between two reference points on the abutment and implant was measured under high resolution (x200) and the difference formed the RD value. The data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and compared with Tukey test (alpha=0.05).

RESULTS

Group D had the highest mean of RD value (55.00 +/- 1.871 microm), while group A had the lowest (2.800 +/- 0.837 microm). Groups A and B had a high statistically significant difference in RD values, as compared to groups C or D (p < .001). Moreover, group C had statistically significant difference from group D (p=.011). Conversely, no statistical significance was obtained when group A was compared with group B.

CONCLUSION

Within the limits of this in vitro study, the RD of the external hexagon joint components occurred significantly under eccentric lateral loading when compared to centric loading. The displacement increased significantly with longer period of eccentric lateral loading.

摘要

目的

本体外研究探讨了不同加载位置和加载周期的侧向循环加载对外六角种植体系统基台旋转位移(RD)的影响。

材料与方法

使用四组,每组五个种植体组件。每个组件由Brånemark系统Mk IV种植体(诺贝尔生物保健公司,瑞典哥德堡)、CeraOne基台(诺贝尔生物保健公司)和一个粘结固位铸件组成。A组和B组分别在种植体长轴中心垂直施加50 N的循环载荷,循环次数分别为0.25×10⁶次和0.50×10⁶次,而C组和D组在距中心4 mm处偏心施加相同载荷,循环次数分别为0.25×10⁶次和0.50×10⁶次。通过在种植体-基台界面手绘一条纵线来评估位移。加载前后,在高分辨率(x200)下测量基台和种植体上两个参考点之间的侧向距离,差值即为RD值。数据采用单因素方差分析,并与Tukey检验进行比较(α = 0.05)。

结果

D组的RD值均值最高(55.00±1.871μm),而A组最低(2.800±0.837μm)。与C组或D组相比,A组和B组的RD值在统计学上有高度显著差异(p <.001)。此外,C组与D组有统计学显著差异(p = 0.011)。相反,A组与B组比较时未获得统计学显著性。

结论

在本体外研究的范围内,与中心加载相比,外六角连接部件在偏心侧向加载下显著发生RD。偏心侧向加载时间越长,位移显著增加。

相似文献

1
Abutment rotational displacement of external hexagon implant system under lateral cyclic loading.侧向循环加载下外六角种植体系统基台的旋转位移
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(2):96-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00006.x.
2
Stability of implant-abutment interface with a hexagon-mediated butt joint: failure mode and bending resistance.带六边形介导对接接头的种植体-基台界面稳定性:失效模式与抗弯曲性
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7(4):221-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00067.x.
3
Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.疲劳测试后种植体-基台界面的检查。
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Mar;85(3):268-75. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.114266.
4
In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.体外评估螺丝固位和粘结固位种植体固定修复体基台螺丝的反向扭矩值和边缘间隙。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6):1061-7.
5
Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs.两种种植体/基台连接设计的抗疲劳性能
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Dec;88(6):604-10. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.129384.
6
Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system.四种种植体-基台界面设计的负载疲劳性能:扭矩水平和种植系统的影响
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):253-62.
7
Effect of lateral cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of an external hexagon implant system.侧向循环加载对外六角种植体系统基台螺丝松动的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Apr;91(4):326-34. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.01.001.
8
Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.种植体-陶瓷基台组合的负载疲劳性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):636-46.
9
Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.牙种植体-基台界面的动态疲劳特性:大直径与标准直径六面体型种植体的关节开口情况
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jun;85(6):599-607. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115250.
10
Critical bending moment of implant-abutment screw joint interfaces: effect of torque levels and implant diameter.种植体-基台螺钉连接界面的临界弯矩:扭矩水平和种植体直径的影响
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Sep-Oct;19(5):648-58.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison in Four Different Implant Systems of Mechanical Resistance to Maximal Stress in Prosthetic Screws-An In Vitro Study.四种不同种植体系统中修复螺钉最大应力机械阻力的比较——一项体外研究
Dent J (Basel). 2020 Oct 9;8(4):116. doi: 10.3390/dj8040116.