• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疲劳测试后种植体-基台界面的检查。

Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.

作者信息

Cibirka R M, Nelson S K, Lang B R, Rueggeberg F A

机构信息

School of Dentistry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga 30912, USA.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Mar;85(3):268-75. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.114266.

DOI:10.1067/mpr.2001.114266
PMID:11264934
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study examined potential differences in detorque values of abutment screws after fatigue testing when the dimensions between external implant hexagon and internal abutment hexagon were altered or the implant external hexagonal shape was eliminated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three subsets (N = 10) of NobelBiocare implants were assessed: (1) standard external hexagon (R), (2) modified hexagon (M), and (3) circular (C) platform geometry. Thirty Procera machined abutments with 25-degree angulated loading platforms were manufactured. Abutments were retained with gold Unigrip abutment screws tightened to 32 N/cm with an electronic torque controller. Vertical scribes across the implant-abutment interface allowed longitudinal displacement evaluation. A carousel-type fatigue testing device delivered dynamic loading forces between 20 and 200 N for 5,000,000 cycles, or the approximate equivalent of 5 years in vivo mastication, through a piston to the abutment platform. Macroscopic and radiographic examination of the implant/abutment specimens was performed. The abutment screws were removed and the detorque values recorded. Bearing surfaces were examined microscopically.

RESULTS

No abutment looseness or longitudinal displacements at the implant-abutment interface were noted. Radiographic examination demonstrated no indication of screw bending or displacement. The mean detorque values for R, M, and C were 14.40 +/- 1.84 N/cm, 14.70 +/- 1.89 N/cm, and 16.40 +/- 2.17 N/cm, respectively. The analysis of variance demonstrated significant differences between only designs R and C (P=.031).

CONCLUSION

Increasing the vertical height, or degree of fit tolerance, between the implant external hexagon and the abutment internal hexagon or completely eliminating the implant external hexagon did not produce a significant effect on the detorque values of the abutment screws after 5,000,000 cycles in fatigue testing, or the equivalent of 5 years' of mastication for the implant/abutment specimens evaluated.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了在疲劳测试后,当种植体外六角与基台内六角之间的尺寸改变或种植体外六角形状被消除时,基台螺钉拆卸扭矩值的潜在差异。

材料与方法

评估了三组(每组n = 10)诺贝尔生物公司的种植体:(1)标准外六角(R),(2)改良六角(M),以及(3)圆形(C)平台几何形状。制作了30个带有25度角加载平台的Procera加工基台。基台用金色Unigrip基台螺钉固定,使用电子扭矩控制器将其拧紧至32 N/cm。在种植体 - 基台界面上的垂直划痕用于纵向位移评估。一个转盘式疲劳测试装置通过活塞向基台平台施加20至200 N的动态加载力,持续5,000,000次循环,或相当于体内5年的咀嚼次数。对种植体/基台标本进行了宏观和影像学检查。移除基台螺钉并记录拆卸扭矩值。对承载表面进行了显微镜检查。

结果

在种植体 - 基台界面未观察到基台松动或纵向位移。影像学检查未显示螺钉弯曲或位移的迹象。R、M和C组的平均拆卸扭矩值分别为14.40±1.84 N/cm、14.70±1.89 N/cm和16.40±2.17 N/cm。方差分析表明仅设计R和C之间存在显著差异(P = 0.031)。

结论

对于所评估的种植体/基台标本,在疲劳测试5,000,000次循环(相当于5年咀嚼)后,增加种植体外六角与基台内六角之间的垂直高度或配合公差程度,或完全消除种植体外六角,对基台螺钉的拆卸扭矩值没有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.疲劳测试后种植体-基台界面的检查。
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Mar;85(3):268-75. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.114266.
2
Evaluation of the precision of fit between the Procera custom abutment and various implant systems.Procera定制基台与各种种植系统之间适配精度的评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Sep-Oct;18(5):652-8.
3
Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.种植体-陶瓷基台组合的负载疲劳性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):636-46.
4
Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.牙种植体-基台界面的动态疲劳特性:大直径与标准直径六面体型种植体的关节开口情况
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jun;85(6):599-607. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115250.
5
Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.四种不同螺钉材料和表面的种植体基台螺钉旋转及预紧力
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jul;86(1):24-32. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.116230.
6
Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface.牙种植体-基台界面的微动及动态疲劳特性
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jan;85(1):47-52. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.112796.
7
Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.使用空气圆柱循环加载装置对种植体螺钉松动进行波形分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Oct;88(4):402-8. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128099.
8
Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.7种六角形顶端基台系统的种植体-基台螺丝连接预紧力
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 May-Jun;16(3):367-77.
9
Abutment rotational displacement of external hexagon implant system under lateral cyclic loading.侧向循环加载下外六角种植体系统基台的旋转位移
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(2):96-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00006.x.
10
Load fatigue performance of two implant-abutment combinations.两种种植体-基台组合的加载疲劳性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Jul-Aug;11(4):522-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches.三种不同种植体设计方法的抗压强度评估
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S1126-S1128. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_193_23. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
2
Comparative analysis of the mechanical limits of resistance in implant/abutment set of a new implant design: An in vitro study.新型种植体设计的种植体/基台连接体抗阻力机械极限的对比分析:一项体外研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0280684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280684. eCollection 2023.
3
Evaluation of customized cobalt-chromium abutments fabricated with different manufacturing process versus titanium stock abutments on the marginal misfit -An study.
不同制作工艺的定制钴铬合金基台与钛基台边缘适合性的比较——一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Jul-Sep;22(3):225-232. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_381_21.
4
Bacterial infiltration and detorque at the implant abutment morse taper interface after masticatory simulation.咀嚼模拟后种植体基台莫氏锥度界面的细菌渗透和松动。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 12;12(1):17103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20915-z.
5
In Vitro Bacterial Leakage at the Implant-Abutment Connection of Two Dental Implant Systems with Internal Connection.两种具有内部连接的牙种植系统种植体-基台连接处的体外细菌渗漏情况
Front Dent. 2020 Dec 8;17:32. doi: 10.18502/fid.v17i32.5196. eCollection 2020.
6
Comparison of Mechanical Resistance to Maximal Torsion Stress in Original and Nonoriginal or Compatible Prosthetic Implant Screws: An In Vitro Study.原装与非原装或兼容义齿种植体螺钉的最大抗扭应力力学性能比较:一项体外研究
Int J Dent. 2021 Dec 2;2021:5133556. doi: 10.1155/2021/5133556. eCollection 2021.
7
Implant Bio-mechanics for Successful Implant Therapy: A Systematic Review.成功种植治疗的种植体生物力学:一项系统评价
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Nov 24;10(6):700-714. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_138_20. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
8
Comparison in Four Different Implant Systems of Mechanical Resistance to Maximal Stress in Prosthetic Screws-An In Vitro Study.四种不同种植体系统中修复螺钉最大应力机械阻力的比较——一项体外研究
Dent J (Basel). 2020 Oct 9;8(4):116. doi: 10.3390/dj8040116.
9
Influence of Implant Connection, Abutment Design and Screw Insertion Torque on Implant-Abutment Misfit.种植体连接、基台设计及螺钉旋入扭矩对种植体-基台不匹配的影响
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 24;9(8):2365. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082365.
10
Effect of dynamic cyclic loading on screw loosening of retightened versus new abutment screw in both narrow and standard implants (in-vitro study).动态循环加载对窄型和标准型种植体中重新拧紧的基台螺钉与新基台螺钉松动的影响(体外研究)。
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Jul 28;6(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00229-3.