Suppr超能文献

反驳安东尼·吉登斯的结构化理论为社会学护理研究提供有用框架这一观点:基于玛格丽特·阿彻的实在论社会理论的批判

Rebutting the suggestion that Anthony Giddens's Structuration Theory offers a useful framework for sociological nursing research: a critique based upon Margaret Archer's Realist Social Theory.

作者信息

Lipscomb Martin

机构信息

Hartpury Campus, Gloucester Centre, Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of the West of England, Gloucester, UK.

出版信息

Nurs Philos. 2006 Jul;7(3):175-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2006.00261.x.

Abstract

A recent paper in this journal by Hardcastle et al. in 2005 argued that Anthony Giddens's Structuration Theory (ST) might usefully inform sociological nursing research. In response, a critique of ST based upon the Realist Social Theory of Margaret Archer is presented. Archer maintains that ST is fatally flawed and, in consequence, it has little to offer nursing research. Following an analysis of the concepts epiphenomenalism and elisionism, it is suggested that emergentist Realist Social Theory captures or describes a more coherent explanatory vision of social reality than other perspectives and nurse researchers are advised to consider its potential.

摘要

哈德卡斯尔等人于2005年发表在本期刊上的一篇论文认为,安东尼·吉登斯的结构化理论(ST)可能会对社会学护理研究有所助益。作为回应,本文提出了基于玛格丽特·阿彻的现实主义社会理论对结构化理论的批判。阿彻认为结构化理论存在致命缺陷,因此它对护理研究几乎没有贡献。在分析了副现象论和省略论的概念之后,本文认为,与其他观点相比,突现论现实主义社会理论对社会现实的解释更连贯,建议护理研究者考虑其潜力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验