Plesa Gabriela, McKenna Philip M, Schnell Matthias J, Eisenlohr Laurence C
Thomas Jefferson University, Kimmel Cancer Center, 233 S. 10th Street, BLSB 730, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
J Virol. 2006 Jul;80(13):6259-66. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00084-06.
The impact of cytolytic versus noncytolytic viral infections on host responses is not well understood, due to limitations of the systems that have been used to address this issue. Using paired cytopathic and noncytopathic rabies viruses that differ by only two amino acids, we investigated several fundamental aspects of the immune response to these viral vectors. Greater cytopathic capacity translated into a greater degree of cross-priming to CD8(+) T cells (T(CD8)(+)) and more-robust short-term humoral and cellular responses. However, long-term responses to the two viruses were similar, suggesting that direct priming drives the bulk of the T(CD8)(+) antirabies response and that enhanced acute responses associated with greater virally mediated cellular destruction were balanced by other factors, such as prolonged antigen expression associated with noncytopathic virus. Such compensatory mechanisms may be in place to ensure comparable immunologic memories to various pathogens.
由于用于解决这一问题的系统存在局限性,溶细胞性与非溶细胞性病毒感染对宿主反应的影响尚未得到充分了解。我们使用仅相差两个氨基酸的成对细胞病变性和非细胞病变性狂犬病病毒,研究了对这些病毒载体免疫反应的几个基本方面。更强的细胞病变能力转化为对CD8(+) T细胞(T(CD8)(+))更高程度的交叉启动以及更强有力的短期体液和细胞反应。然而,对这两种病毒的长期反应相似,这表明直接启动驱动了大部分T(CD8)(+)抗狂犬病反应,并且与更强的病毒介导的细胞破坏相关的增强急性反应被其他因素所平衡,例如与非细胞病变性病毒相关的延长抗原表达。这种补偿机制可能存在以确保对各种病原体具有可比的免疫记忆。