Suppr超能文献

关于国际放射防护委员会2005年建议中的一些不一致之处的评论:排除水平

A commentary on some inconsistencies in the icrp 2005 recommendations: exclusion levels.

作者信息

Kramer Gary H

机构信息

Human Monitoring Laboratory, Radiation Protection Bureau, 775 Brookfield Road PL6302D1, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 1C1, Canada.

出版信息

Health Phys. 2006 Jul;91(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000196110.12298.c9.

Abstract

The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 2005 Recommendations, which were released at the International Radiation Protection Association's congress held in Madrid (May 2004), have been available for public comment via the ICRP's Web site. The comment period has now closed and the Recommendations are presumably being re-worked. There are several inconsistencies in the Recommendations and they are exemplified by looking at the exclusion levels in more detail. The relevant text of the Recommendations is included in this paper as an . It is suggested that the International Atomic Energy Agency's approach is more balanced where each nuclide receives its own exclusion level instead of the incomplete and arbitrary categories proposed by the ICRP.

摘要

国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)2005年建议书于2004年5月在马德里举行的国际辐射防护协会大会上发布,已通过ICRP网站供公众发表意见。意见征集期现已结束,建议书大概正在重新修订。这些建议书中存在一些不一致之处,通过更详细地研究排除水平可以举例说明。建议书中的相关文本作为附件包含在本文中。有人认为,国际原子能机构的方法更为平衡,即每种核素都有自己的排除水平,而不是ICRP提出的不完整且随意的类别。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验