Suppr超能文献

在接受口服抗糖尿病药物治疗的初治2型糖尿病患者中,强化混合胰岛素治疗与基础胰岛素治疗的比较。

A comparison of intensive mixture therapy with basal insulin therapy in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes receiving oral antidiabetes agents.

作者信息

Jacober S J, Scism-Bacon J L, Zagar A J

机构信息

Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006 Jul;8(4):448-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00605.x.

Abstract

AIM

In patients with type 2 diabetes, insulin therapy is commonly initiated with either a single dose of basal insulin or twice-daily premixed (basal plus prandial) insulin despite no widely accepted recommendation. We compared the glycaemic control, as measured by a change in HbA1c, of intensive mixture therapy (IMT), a basal plus prandial regimen using insulin lispro mixture 50/50 (50% lispro and 50% NPL) before breakfast and lunch and insulin lispro mixture 25/75 (25% lispro and 75% NPL) before dinner, vs. once-daily insulin glargine therapy, while continuing patients on oral antidiabetes medications.

METHODS

Following inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c 1.2-2.0 times the upper limit of normal) and at least 2 months of two or more oral antidiabetes agent therapy, 60 insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to one of the insulin regimens for 4 months with crossover to the alternative regimen for an additional 4 months. Glycaemic goals were preprandial blood glucose <120 mg/dl (6.7 mmol/l) and 2-h postprandial blood glucose <180 mg/dl (10.0 mmol/l). The insulin dose was optimized by investigators without forced titration.

RESULTS

Mean prestudy (baseline) HbA1c for all patients was 9.21 +/- 1.33% (+/-s.d.). IMT compared to glargine resulted in both a lower endpoint in HbA1c (7.08 +/- 0.11% vs. 7.34 +/- 0.11%; p = 0.003) and a greater change in HbA1c from pretherapy (-1.01 +/- 0.10% vs. -0.75 +/- 0.10%; p = 0.0068). Forty-four per cent of patients receiving IMT and 31% of patients receiving insulin glargine achieved HbA1c < or = 7%. Two-hour postprandial glucose values (for all three meals) and predinner glucose values were significantly less with IMT than with insulin glargine (p = 0.0034, 0.0001, 0.0066 and 0.0205). Overall hypoglycaemia throughout the complete treatment period was infrequent (IMT vs. Glargine: 3.98 +/- 4.74 vs. 2.57 +/- 3.22 episodes/patient/30 days, p = 0.0013), and no severe hypoglycaemia was observed during the study with either therapy. There was no difference in nocturnal hypoglycaemia between the two therapies. The mean insulin dose at the end of therapy was greater for IMT than for once-daily insulin glargine (0.353 +/- 0.256 vs. 0.276 +/- 0.207 IU/kg, p = 0.0107).

CONCLUSIONS

In combination with oral antidiabetes agents, multiple daily injections of a basal plus prandial insulin IMT regimen (using premixed insulin lispro formulations) resulted in greater improvements and a lower endpoint in HbA1c compared with a basal-only insulin regimen. IMT also resulted in improved postprandial blood glucose control at each meal and enabled administration of a greater daily dose of insulin, which most likely contributed to these lower HbA1c measures. This greater reduction in HbA1c with IMT is accompanied by a small increased occurrence of mild hypoglycaemia but without any severe hypoglycaemia. Greater consideration should be given to initiating insulin as a basal plus prandial regimen rather than a basal-only regimen.

摘要

目的

在2型糖尿病患者中,尽管没有广泛认可的推荐方案,但胰岛素治疗通常起始于单剂量基础胰岛素或每日两次预混(基础加餐时)胰岛素治疗。我们比较了强化混合治疗(IMT)与每日一次甘精胰岛素治疗的血糖控制情况(通过糖化血红蛋白[HbA1c]变化来衡量),IMT是一种基础加餐时治疗方案,早餐和午餐前使用赖脯胰岛素50/50混合制剂(50%赖脯胰岛素和50%中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素),晚餐前使用赖脯胰岛素25/75混合制剂(25%赖脯胰岛素和75%中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素),同时患者继续服用口服抗糖尿病药物。

方法

在血糖控制不佳(HbA1c为正常上限的1.2 - 2.0倍)且接受两种或更多种口服抗糖尿病药物治疗至少2个月后,60例2型糖尿病初治患者被随机分配至其中一种胰岛素治疗方案,为期4个月,然后交叉至另一种方案再治疗4个月。血糖目标为餐前血糖<120 mg/dl(6.7 mmol/l),餐后2小时血糖<180 mg/dl(10.0 mmol/l)。胰岛素剂量由研究者优化,不进行强制滴定。

结果

所有患者研究前(基线)平均HbA1c为9.21±1.33%(±标准差)。与甘精胰岛素相比,IMT使HbA1c的终点值更低(7.08±0.11% vs. 7.34±0.11%;p = 0.003),且HbA1c较治疗前的变化更大(-1.01±0.10% vs. -0.75±0.10%;p = 0.0068)。接受IMT的患者中有44%、接受甘精胰岛素的患者中有31%达到HbA1c≤7%。IMT组三餐后2小时血糖值及晚餐前血糖值均显著低于甘精胰岛素组(p = 0.0034、0.0001、0.0066和0.0205)。整个治疗期间总体低血糖事件发生率较低(IMT组与甘精胰岛素组:3.98±4.74次/患者/30天 vs. 2.57±3.22次/患者/30天,p = 0.0013),且两种治疗在研究期间均未观察到严重低血糖事件。两种治疗在夜间低血糖方面无差异。治疗结束时,IMT组的平均胰岛素剂量高于每日一次甘精胰岛素组(0.353±0.256 vs. 0.276±0.207 IU/kg,p = 0.0107)。

结论

与口服抗糖尿病药物联合使用时,每日多次注射基础加餐时胰岛素IMT方案(使用预混赖脯胰岛素制剂)与仅使用基础胰岛素方案相比,能使HbA1c有更大改善且终点值更低。IMT还能改善每餐餐后血糖控制,并能给予更大的每日胰岛素剂量,这很可能是HbA1c降低幅度更大的原因。IMT使HbA1c有更大幅度降低的同时,轻度低血糖事件的发生率略有增加,但未出现严重低血糖事件。应更多考虑起始胰岛素治疗时采用基础加餐时方案而非仅基础胰岛素方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验