Polacsek Michele, O'Brien Liam M, Lagasse Wendie, Hammar Nicole
Maine-Harvard Prevention Research Center, Maine Center for Public Health, 12 Church St, Augusta, ME 04330, USA.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2006 Jul;3(3):A101. Epub 2006 Jun 15.
We describe the evaluation process and outcomes of Move & Improve, a worksite wellness program in Maine. The evaluation process was based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health and community-based participatory research principles. Innovative approaches are required to address burgeoning chronic disease trends and risk factors. Worksites are an ideal setting in which to affect working adults and high-risk individuals. Using community-based participatory research methodology increases community capacity for evaluation, dissemination, and use of evaluation results.
Move & Improve is an ongoing program that was implemented in 1996. Although evaluation data have been collected since the program's inception, a more systematic evaluation based on community-based participatory research principles was undertaken in 2003 and 2004 with the technical assistance of the Maine-Harvard Prevention Research Center and Colby College.
The Maine-Harvard Prevention Research Center facilitated the development of a program logic model, evaluation questions, data collection instruments, an analysis plan, presentations, and reports. We used a cross-sectional study design with nonparticipant comparison groups.
Data indicate possible program improvement strategies and substantial improvements in lifestyle factors among participants.
Limitations of the evaluation include participant self-selection, cross-sectional study design, a lack of adequate resources for evaluation, and the challenges of using community-based participatory research methods. Despite these limitations, Move & Improve program staff consider the evaluation of the program a success and have learned ways to improve the program and future evaluation efforts. Overall satisfaction with the process has been nurtured through community-based participatory research methods. This approach also enabled us to meet key evaluation standards.
我们描述了缅因州一个工作场所健康促进项目“行动与改善”的评估过程及结果。该评估过程基于疾病控制与预防中心的公共卫生项目评估框架以及社区参与式研究原则。应对迅速增长的慢性病趋势和风险因素需要创新方法。工作场所是影响在职成年人及高危个体的理想场所。采用社区参与式研究方法可提高社区评估、传播及使用评估结果的能力。
“行动与改善”是一个始于1996年的持续项目。尽管自项目启动以来就收集了评估数据,但在缅因州-哈佛大学预防研究中心和科尔比学院的技术协助下,于2003年和2004年开展了基于社区参与式研究原则的更系统评估。
缅因州-哈佛大学预防研究中心协助制定了项目逻辑模型、评估问题、数据收集工具、分析计划、展示内容及报告。我们采用了带有非参与对照组的横断面研究设计。
数据表明了可能的项目改进策略以及参与者生活方式因素的显著改善。
评估的局限性包括参与者的自我选择、横断面研究设计、评估资源不足以及使用社区参与式研究方法面临的挑战。尽管存在这些局限性,“行动与改善”项目工作人员认为该项目评估是成功的,并已学到了改进项目及未来评估工作的方法。通过社区参与式研究方法培养了对该过程的总体满意度。这种方法还使我们能够达到关键评估标准。