Suppr超能文献

非苯二氮䓬类药物阿吡坦与劳拉西泮治疗非精神病性焦虑症患者的对照研究。

A comparative study of alpidem, a nonbenzodiazepine, and lorazepam in patients with nonpsychotic anxiety.

作者信息

Diamond B I, Nguyen H, O'Neal E, Ochs R, Kaffeman M, Borison R L

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912.

出版信息

Psychopharmacol Bull. 1991;27(1):67-71.

PMID:1677774
Abstract

The use of benzodiazepines for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is a safe and effective treatment; however, their potential to produce dependence and impair psychomotor and cognitive functions is a drawback. In this study the efficacy and safety of alpidem, a nonbenzodiazepine, was assessed. Thirty patients who met DSM-III-R criteria for GAD were randomized to either alpidem (225 mg), lorazepam (4.5 mg), or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A). A repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to determine differences in HAM-A scores over time. The results showed a trend for alpidem to be more effective. Half of the alpidem group had a decrease of 50 percent or greater in their HAM-A scores with an almost equal effect on psychic and somatic symptoms. The most common side effects with alpidem and lorazepam were lightheadedness, drowsiness, and daytime tiredness. Moreover, treatment with alpidem did not manifest any withdrawal symptoms. Thus nonbenzodiazepine treatments are effective and safe for GAD.

摘要

使用苯二氮䓬类药物治疗广泛性焦虑症(GAD)是一种安全有效的疗法;然而,它们有产生依赖性以及损害精神运动和认知功能的可能性,这是一个缺点。在本研究中,对一种非苯二氮䓬类药物阿吡坦的疗效和安全性进行了评估。30名符合DSM-III-R广泛性焦虑症标准的患者被随机分为阿吡坦组(225毫克)、劳拉西泮组(4.5毫克)或安慰剂组。主要疗效指标是汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)。采用重复测量多变量方差分析(MANOVA)来确定HAM-A评分随时间的差异。结果显示阿吡坦有更有效的趋势。阿吡坦组中有一半患者的HAM-A评分降低了50%或更多,对精神症状和躯体症状的影响几乎相同。阿吡坦和劳拉西泮最常见的副作用是头晕、嗜睡和日间疲劳。此外,使用阿吡坦治疗未出现任何戒断症状。因此,非苯二氮䓬类药物治疗广泛性焦虑症有效且安全。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验