Suppr超能文献

一项比较伊沙匹隆与劳拉西泮治疗广泛性焦虑症患者的疗效和安全性的双盲、安慰剂对照研究:一项前瞻性多中心试验。

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of ipsapirone versus lorazepam in patients with generalized anxiety disorder: a prospective multicenter trial.

作者信息

Cutler N R, Sramek J J, Keppel Hesselink J M, Krol A, Roeschen J, Rickels K, Schweizer E

机构信息

Miles Inc., West Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1993 Dec;13(6):429-37.

PMID:7907097
Abstract

This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study compared the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ipsapirone (an azapirone anxiolytic) at daily dose levels of 10.0 to 30.0 mg with a daily dose of 2.0 to 6.0 mg of lorazepam (a benzodiazepine) or placebo when given to outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) of moderate or greater severity. A total of 317 outpatients with a primary diagnosis of GAD according to DSM-III criteria (at least 1 month's duration) were randomized. Study entry criteria at the time of screening and at baseline included a Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) score of 18 or more, a Covi Anxiety Scale score of 8 or more, and a Raskin Depression Scale score of 7 or less. The study design consisted of a 1-week, single-blind placebo evaluation, a 4-week, double-blind acute treatment period, and a 4-week extension period, followed by a 2-week, single-blind placebo withdrawal period. Efficacy was measured by changes in the HAM-A and Clinical Global Impression Scale and by evaluations of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and Zung-Anxiety Self-Rating scale. The Raskin and Covi scales were performed at screening and baseline only. Withdrawal reactions were assessed during the withdrawal period by the Physician Withdrawal Checklist and by a patient self-rating checklist. Two-hundred sixty-three patients were valid for the analysis of efficacy in the ipsapirone (N = 87), lorazepam (N = 89), and placebo (N = 87) groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

这项多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照、随机研究比较了在给予中度或更严重广泛性焦虑症(GAD)门诊患者时,10.0至30.0毫克每日剂量的伊沙匹隆(一种氮杂螺环癸烷抗焦虑药)与2.0至6.0毫克每日剂量的劳拉西泮(一种苯二氮䓬类药物)或安慰剂的疗效、安全性和耐受性。根据DSM-III标准(病程至少1个月),共有317例初步诊断为GAD的门诊患者被随机分组。筛查时和基线时的研究纳入标准包括汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)评分18分或更高、科维焦虑量表评分8分或更高以及拉斯金抑郁量表评分7分或更低。研究设计包括为期1周的单盲安慰剂评估、为期4周的双盲急性治疗期、为期4周的延长期,随后是为期2周的单盲安慰剂撤药期。疗效通过HAM-A和临床总体印象量表的变化以及汉密尔顿抑郁量表和zung焦虑自评量表的评估来衡量。拉斯金量表和科维量表仅在筛查和基线时进行。撤药反应在撤药期通过医生撤药检查表和患者自评检查表进行评估。伊沙匹隆组(N = 87)、劳拉西泮组(N = 89)和安慰剂组(N = 87)中有263例患者可进行疗效分析。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验