• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当前的电子系统能否满足药物安全性和有效性要求?

Can current electronic systems meet drug safety and effectiveness requirements?

作者信息

Holbrook Anne, Grootendorst Paul, Willison Don, Goldsmith Charles, Sebaldt Rolf, Keshavjee Karim

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toronto.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:335-9.

PMID:16779057
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1560699/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Every health policy jurisdiction is endeavoring to enhance its ability to evaluate drug effectiveness, safety and cost in the real world (pharmacosurveillance).

METHODS

A nominal group consensus conference of stakeholders finalized data items deemed necessary for pharmacosurveillance. Large administrative datasets (LADs), electronic health records (EHRs) and electronic patient registries (PRs), were investigated as sources of this information and for their vulnerability to methodologic bias. Health data privacy legislation and research guidelines were systematically reviewed for their constraint to linked data resource analyses.

RESULTS

More than 129 data items were strongly recommended for routine pharmacosurveillance. LADs had very complete information, but restricted to a small number of required data items. EHRs, especially with e-pharmacy links, offer by far the most complete set of health information domains but data entry completeness is highly variable. Adjustment methods for channeling bias are inadequate to mimic randomized trials. Anonymized, linked data held within a secure academic research environment, poses the least privacy concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Notwithstanding major technical, methodologic and privacy challenges, individual-level linkage of health data resources poses the best option for pharmacosurveillance today. In future, drug regulators and reimbursement agencies should consider mandatory post-marketing randomized trials.

摘要

背景

每个卫生政策辖区都在努力提高其在现实世界中评估药物有效性、安全性和成本的能力(药物监测)。

方法

利益相关者名义群体共识会议最终确定了药物监测所需的数据项目。对大型行政数据集(LADs)、电子健康记录(EHRs)和电子患者登记册(PRs)作为该信息来源及其对方法学偏差的易感性进行了调查。系统审查了健康数据隐私立法和研究指南对关联数据资源分析的限制。

结果

强烈建议超过129个数据项目用于常规药物监测。LADs拥有非常完整的信息,但仅限于少数所需数据项目。EHRs,尤其是与电子药房链接的EHRs,提供了迄今为止最完整的健康信息领域集,但数据录入完整性差异很大。用于疏导偏差的调整方法不足以模拟随机试验。在安全的学术研究环境中保存的匿名关联数据引发的隐私担忧最少。

结论

尽管存在重大的技术、方法学和隐私挑战,但健康数据资源的个体层面关联是当今药物监测的最佳选择。未来,药物监管机构和报销机构应考虑强制进行上市后随机试验。

相似文献

1
Can current electronic systems meet drug safety and effectiveness requirements?当前的电子系统能否满足药物安全性和有效性要求?
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:335-9.
2
Considerations for the analysis of longitudinal electronic health records linked to claims data to study the effectiveness and safety of drugs.分析与索赔数据相关联的纵向电子健康记录以研究药物有效性和安全性的注意事项。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Aug;100(2):147-59. doi: 10.1002/cpt.359. Epub 2016 May 12.
3
Linking a pharmaceutical claims database with a birth defects registry to investigate birth defect rates of suspected teratogens.将药品报销数据库与出生缺陷登记处相链接,以调查可疑致畸物的出生缺陷发生率。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Nov;19(11):1137-50. doi: 10.1002/pds.1995.
4
[Databases as a source for monitoring systems of drug safety].[作为药物安全监测系统来源的数据库]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2004 Jun;47(6):513-7. doi: 10.1007/s00103-004-0834-3.
5
Pediatric post-marketing safety systems in North America: assessment of the current status.北美的儿科上市后安全系统:现状评估
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Aug;24(8):785-92. doi: 10.1002/pds.3813. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
6
[Encryption technique for linkable anonymizing].[可链接匿名化的加密技术]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2004 Jun;51(6):445-51.
7
Data mining on electronic health record databases for signal detection in pharmacovigilance: which events to monitor?基于电子健康记录数据库的数据挖掘在药物警戒中的信号检测:应监测哪些事件?
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Dec;18(12):1176-84. doi: 10.1002/pds.1836.
8
Combining multiple healthcare databases for postmarketing drug and vaccine safety surveillance: why and how?结合多个医疗保健数据库进行药品和疫苗上市后安全性监测:为什么以及如何进行?
J Intern Med. 2014 Jun;275(6):551-61. doi: 10.1111/joim.12159.
9
An 'Honest Broker' mechanism to maintain privacy for patient care and academic medical research.一种用于维护患者护理和学术医学研究隐私的“诚实中介”机制。
Int J Med Inform. 2007 May-Jun;76(5-6):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
10
[Electronic medical record, confidentiality and safeguarding of privacy].[电子病历、保密性与隐私保护]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 Feb 12;144(7):334-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Bias in pharmacoepidemiologic studies using secondary health care databases: a scoping review.利用二级医疗保健数据库进行药物流行病学研究中的偏倚:范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 11;19(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0695-y.
2
Consensus recommendations for systematic evaluation of drug-drug interaction evidence for clinical decision support.用于临床决策支持的药物相互作用证据系统评价的共识性建议。
Drug Saf. 2015 Feb;38(2):197-206. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0262-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Legal issues of data anonymisation in research.研究中数据匿名化的法律问题。
BMJ. 2004 May 29;328(7451):1300-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1300.
2
Data protection, informed consent, and research.数据保护、知情同意与研究
BMJ. 2004 May 1;328(7447):1029-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7447.1029.
3
Impracticability of informed consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network.加拿大卒中网络登记处中知情同意的不可行性。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 1;350(14):1414-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa031697.
4
Why don't we initiate more large simple randomized controlled trials?我们为什么不开展更多大型简单随机对照试验呢?
CMAJ. 2003 Nov 25;169(11):1170-1.
5
A clinical trials register for Europe.欧洲临床试验注册库。
BMJ. 2002 Dec 7;325(7376):1314-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7376.1314.
6
Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial.健康绝经后妇女使用雌激素加孕激素的风险与益处:妇女健康倡议随机对照试验的主要结果
JAMA. 2002 Jul 17;288(3):321-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.3.321.
7
Better access to information about clinical trials.更好地获取有关临床试验的信息。
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Oct 17;133(8):609-14. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-8-200010170-00013.
8
Pragmatic randomised controlled trials in psychiatry.精神病学中的实用随机对照试验。
Br J Psychiatry. 1999 Sep;175:217-23. doi: 10.1192/bjp.175.3.217.
9
Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group.雌激素加孕激素用于绝经后妇女冠心病二级预防的随机试验。心脏与雌激素/孕激素替代研究(HERS)研究组
JAMA. 1998 Aug 19;280(7):605-13. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.7.605.
10
What questions can large, simple trials answer?大型简单试验能够回答哪些问题?
Cerebrovasc Dis. 1998 Mar;8 Suppl 2:30-6. doi: 10.1159/000047509.