• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

平板电脑与个人数字助理在眼科护理即时记录中的直接比较。

Direct comparison of a tablet computer and a personal digital assistant for point-of-care documentation in eye care.

作者信息

Silvey Garry M, Macri Jennifer M, Lee Paul P, Lobach David F

机构信息

Division of Clinical Informatics, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:689-93.

PMID:16779128
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1560810/
Abstract

New mobile computing devices including personal digital assistants (PDAs) and tablet computers have emerged to facilitate data collection at the point of care. Unfortunately, little research has been reported regarding which device is optimal for a given care setting. In this study we created and compared functionally identical applications on a Palm operating system-based PDA and a Windows-based tablet computer for point-of-care documentation of clinical observations by eye care professionals when caring for patients with diabetes. Eye-care professionals compared the devices through focus group sessions and through validated usability surveys. We found that the application on the tablet computer was preferred over the PDA for documenting the complex data related to eye care. Our findings suggest that the selection of a mobile computing platform depends on the amount and complexity of the data to be entered; the tablet computer functions better for high volume, complex data entry, and the PDA, for low volume, simple data entry.

摘要

包括个人数字助理(PDA)和平板电脑在内的新型移动计算设备已经出现,以方便在护理现场进行数据收集。不幸的是,关于哪种设备在特定护理环境中是最佳选择的研究报道很少。在本研究中,我们在基于Palm操作系统的PDA和基于Windows的平板电脑上创建并比较了功能相同的应用程序,用于眼科护理专业人员在护理糖尿病患者时对临床观察进行护理现场记录。眼科护理专业人员通过焦点小组会议和经过验证的可用性调查对这些设备进行了比较。我们发现,在记录与眼科护理相关的复杂数据时,平板电脑上的应用程序比PDA更受青睐。我们的研究结果表明,移动计算平台的选择取决于要输入的数据量和复杂性;平板电脑在大量、复杂的数据输入方面功能更好,而PDA在少量、简单的数据输入方面表现更佳。

相似文献

1
Direct comparison of a tablet computer and a personal digital assistant for point-of-care documentation in eye care.平板电脑与个人数字助理在眼科护理即时记录中的直接比较。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:689-93.
2
Creation and use of a survey instrument for comparing mobile computing devices.用于比较移动计算设备的调查工具的创建与使用。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:1040.
3
Assessment of relative importance of tablet computer features in supporting direct electronic documentation of encounters by eye care professionals.评估平板电脑功能在支持眼科护理专业人员对会诊进行直接电子记录方面的相对重要性。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:1001.
4
Overcoming obstacles to collecting narrative data from eye care professionals at the point-of-care.克服在医疗现场从眼科护理专业人员处收集叙述性数据的障碍。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:1116.
5
Assessing medical residents' usage and perceived needs for personal digital assistants.评估住院医师对个人数字助理的使用情况及感知需求。
Int J Med Inform. 2004 Feb;73(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2003.12.005.
6
Identifying and overcoming obstacles to point-of-care data collection for eye care professionals.为眼科护理专业人员识别并克服即时医疗数据收集的障碍。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:465-9.
7
Point-of-care technology supports bedside documentation.床边即时技术支持床边文档记录。
J Nurs Adm. 2010 Sep;40(9):360-5. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181ee4248.
8
Value of wireless personal digital assistants for practice: perceptions of advanced practice nurses.无线个人数字助理在实践中的价值:高级执业护士的看法。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Aug;17(16):2146-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02351.x.
9
Evidence in the palm of your hand: development of an outcomes-focused knowledge translation intervention.手中的证据:以结果为导向的知识转化干预措施的制定
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4(2):69-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00084.x.
10
Supporting evidence-based practice for nurses through information technologies.通过信息技术为护士提供循证实践支持。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2010 Mar;7(1):4-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2009.00179.x. Epub 2009 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating tablet computers as a survey tool in rural communities.评估平板电脑作为农村社区调查工具的情况。
J Rural Health. 2015 Winter;31(1):108-17. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12095. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
2
How complex documentation with Personal Digital Assistants could be?使用个人数字助理进行的复杂文档记录会有多复杂?
NI 2012 (2012). 2012 Jun 23;2012:422. eCollection 2012.

本文引用的文献

1
Medicine on the move. PDAs and tablet PCs make the rounds with doctors and nurses.
Postgrad Med. 2004 Feb;115(2):suppl i-vi.
2
Comparison of handheld computer-assisted and conventional paper chart documentation of medical records. A randomized, controlled trial.手持计算机辅助与传统纸质病历记录的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Mar;86(3):553-60. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200403000-00014.
3
Why don't physicians use their personal digital assistants?医生们为什么不使用他们的个人数字助理呢?
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:405-4.
4
Development and comparison of user acceptance of advanced comprehensive triage PDA support system with a traditional terminal alternative system.先进综合分诊掌上电脑支持系统与传统终端替代系统的用户接受度开发及比较
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:140-4.
5
PalmCIS: a wireless handheld application for satisfying clinician information needs.掌上临床信息系统(PalmCIS):一款满足临床医生信息需求的无线手持应用程序。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Jan-Feb;11(1):19-28. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1387. Epub 2003 Oct 5.
6
Handheld computing in medicine.医学中的手持计算
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Mar-Apr;10(2):139-49. doi: 10.1197/jamia.m1180.
7
Comparison of commonly used orthopaedic outcome measures using palm-top computers and paper surveys.使用掌上电脑和纸质调查问卷对常用骨科疗效评估指标的比较。
J Orthop Res. 2002 Nov;20(6):1146-51. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00059-1.
8
The implementation of a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) based patient record and charting system: lessons learned.基于个人数字助理(PDA)的患者记录与图表系统的实施:经验教训
Proc AMIA Symp. 2002:111-5.
9
Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about, and attitudes toward computers.一种用于测量医生对计算机的使用情况、知识掌握程度及态度的工具的开发与初步验证。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 Mar-Apr;5(2):164-76. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050164.
10
Doctors' attitudes to a computer-based clinical information system.
Methods Inf Med. 1981 Oct;20(4):196-9.