Sideris Irene, Glattke Theodore J
Children's National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20011, USA.
J Commun Disord. 2006 Nov-Dec;39(6):391-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2005.11.006. Epub 2006 Jun 14.
The outcome of hearing screening using conventional pure tone behavioral testing was compared with the outcome employing measures of transient otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in a preschool population under conditions typical of educational settings. Two hundred children ranging in age from 2 years 1 month to 5 years 10 months were screened. Nearly equal numbers of children were referred from the two types of screening activities. The majority of referrals from the pure tone screening were due to an inability to condition the children to respond. Only 10% of the children referred from the TEOAE screening received a referral due to an inability to cooperate. Approximately 44% of the children referred from the pure tone screening also failed the immittance screening, whereas 62% of those who referred from the TEOAE screening also failed immittance screening.
As a result of completing this activity, the learner will obtain information about vocabulary development in children with hearing loss, referral rates from preschool hearing screening programs and the influence of middle ear status on referrals.
在典型的教育环境条件下,对学龄前儿童群体采用传统纯音行为测试进行听力筛查的结果与采用瞬态耳声发射(TEOAE)测量方法的结果进行了比较。对200名年龄在2岁1个月至5岁10个月之间的儿童进行了筛查。两种筛查活动转介的儿童数量几乎相等。纯音筛查转介的大多数儿童是由于无法使儿童配合做出反应。TEOAE筛查转介的儿童中只有10%是由于无法配合而被转介。纯音筛查转介的儿童中约44%也未能通过声导抗筛查,而TEOAE筛查转介的儿童中有62%也未能通过声导抗筛查。
通过完成本活动,学习者将获得有关听力损失儿童词汇发展、学龄前听力筛查项目转介率以及中耳状况对转介影响的信息。