Steudel-Numbers Karen L
Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
J Hum Evol. 2006 Nov;51(5):445-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.05.001. Epub 2006 May 7.
Previous studies of daily energy expenditure (DEE) in hominin fossils have estimated locomotor costs using a formula that was based on six species, all 18 kg or less in mass, including no primates, and that has a number of other problems when applied in an ecological context. It is well established that the energetic cost of human walking is lower than that of representative mammals, particularly for individuals with long lower limbs. The current study reevaluates the daily energy expenditures of a variety of hominin species using more appropriate approaches to estimating locomotor costs. To estimate DEE for primates, I relied on published data on body mass, day range, and the percentage of time spent in various activities. Based on those data, I calculated a value for nonlocomotor DEE. I then used a variant of a method that I have suggested elsewhere to calculate the daily cost due to locomotion (DEEL) and summed the two to calculate total DEE. The more up-to-date methods for calculating the cost of travel result in lower estimates of this aspect of the energy budget than seen in previous studies. Values obtained here for DEE in various representatives of Australopithecus are lower than reported previously by around 200 kcal/day. Taking into account the greater economy of human walking, particularly the effect of the longer lower limbs found in many later Homo species, also results in lowered estimates of DEE. Elongation of the lower limbs in H. erectus reduced relative travel costs nearly 50% in comparison to A.L. 288-1 (A. afarensis). The present method for calculating DEE indicates that female H. erectus DEE was 84% greater than that of female Australopithecus; this disparity is even larger than that suggested by previous workers.
先前对古人类化石每日能量消耗(DEE)的研究,使用了一个基于六个物种(体重均在18千克或以下,且均非灵长类动物)的公式来估算运动成本,而该公式在应用于生态环境时存在诸多其他问题。众所周知,人类行走的能量消耗低于代表性哺乳动物,尤其是对于下肢较长的个体而言。当前的研究使用更合适的方法来估算运动成本,从而重新评估了各种古人类物种的每日能量消耗。为了估算灵长类动物的DEE,我依赖已发表的关于体重、日活动范围以及在各种活动中所花费时间百分比的数据。基于这些数据,我计算出了非运动性DEE的值。然后,我使用了一种我在其他地方提出的方法的变体来计算因运动产生的每日成本(DEEL),并将两者相加来计算总DEE。与先前的研究相比,更新的计算旅行成本的方法得出的能量预算这一方面的估计值更低。此处获得的南方古猿各代表物种的DEE值比先前报道的低约200千卡/天。考虑到人类行走的经济性更高,特别是许多晚期智人物种中发现的下肢较长的影响,也会导致DEE的估计值降低。与阿法南方古猿(A.L. 288 - 1)相比,直立人下肢的延长使相对旅行成本降低了近50%。目前计算DEE的方法表明,直立人女性的DEE比南方古猿女性高84%;这种差异甚至比先前研究者所指出的还要大。