Armstrong Rebecca, Doyle Jodie, Lamb Chris, Waters Elizabeth
Cochrane Health Promotion and Public Health Field, VicHealth, 15-31 Pelham St, PO Box 154, Carlton South VIC 3053, Melbourne, Australia.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2006 Jun;28(2):168-72. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdl013.
Evidence-informed health promotion and public health is an emerging and ever-changing theme in research and practice. A collaborative approach to gathering and applying evidence is crucial to implementing effective multi-sectoral health promotion and public health interventions for improved population outcomes. This paper presents an argument for the development of multi-sector evidence and discusses both facilitators and challenges to this process.
Sector-specific contacts familiar with decision-making processes were selected from referrals gained through academic, government and non-government networks and interviewed (in-person or via telephone) as part of a small scale study to scope the use of evidence within non-health sectors where decisions are likely to impact on public health.
The views gathered are preliminary, and this analysis would benefit from more extensive consultation. Nonetheless, information gathered from the interviews and literature search provide valuable insights into evidence-related decision-making paradigms which demonstrate similarities with, and differences from, those found in the health sector.
Decisions in health promotion and public may benefit from consideration of the ways in which disciplines and sectors can work together to inform policy and practice.
基于证据的健康促进和公共卫生是研究与实践中一个新兴且不断变化的主题。采用协作方式收集和应用证据对于实施有效的多部门健康促进和公共卫生干预措施以改善人群健康状况至关重要。本文提出了发展多部门证据的观点,并讨论了这一过程中的促进因素和挑战。
从通过学术、政府和非政府网络获得的推荐中,挑选熟悉决策过程的特定部门联系人,并作为一项小规模研究的一部分进行访谈(面对面或通过电话),以探究在决策可能影响公共卫生的非卫生部门中证据的使用情况。
收集到的观点是初步的,更多广泛的咨询将使本分析受益。尽管如此,从访谈和文献检索中收集到的信息为与证据相关的决策范式提供了宝贵见解,这些范式显示出与卫生部门中发现的范式的异同。
健康促进和公共卫生领域的决策可能会受益于对各学科和部门合作方式的考虑,以指导政策和实践。