Bakhtadze E, Borg H, Stenström G, Fernlund P, Arnqvist H J, Ekbom-Schnell A, Bolinder J, Eriksson J W, Gudbjörnsdottir S, Nyström L, Groop L C, Sundkvist G
Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Lund University, Malmö University Hospital, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.
Diabetologia. 2006 Aug;49(8):1785-94. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0293-5. Epub 2006 May 31.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The World Health Organization considers an aetiological classification of diabetes to be essential. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether HLA-DQB1 genotypes facilitate the classification of diabetes as compared with assessment of islet antibodies by investigating young adult diabetic patients.
Blood samples were available at diagnosis for 1,872 (90%) of the 2,077 young adult patients (aged 15-34 years old) over a 5-year period in the nationwide Diabetes Incidence Study in Sweden. Islet antibodies were measured at diagnosis in 1,869 patients, fasting plasma C-peptide (fpC-peptide) after diagnosis in 1,522, while HLA-DQB1 genotypes were determined in 1,743.
Islet antibodies were found in 83% of patients clinically considered to have type 1 diabetes, 23% with type 2 diabetes and 45% with unclassifiable diabetes. After diagnosis, median fpC-peptide concentrations were markedly lower in patients with islet antibodies than in those without (0.24 vs 0.69 nmol/l, p<0.0001). Irrespective of clinical classification, patients with islet antibodies showed increased frequencies of at least one of the risk-associated HLA-DQB1 genotypes compared with patients without. Antibody-negative patients with risk-associated HLA-DQB1 genotypes had significantly lower median fpC-peptide concentrations than those without risk-associated genotypes (0.51 vs 0.74 nmol/l, p=0.0003).
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Assessment of islet antibodies is necessary for the aetiological classification of diabetic patients. HLA-DQB1 genotyping does not improve the classification in patients with islet antibodies. However, in patients without islet antibodies, HLA-DQB1 genotyping together with C-peptide measurement may be of value in differentiating between idiopathic type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes.
目的/假设:世界卫生组织认为糖尿病的病因分类至关重要。本研究的目的是通过调查年轻成年糖尿病患者,评估与胰岛抗体评估相比,HLA - DQB1基因型是否有助于糖尿病的分类。
在瑞典全国糖尿病发病率研究的5年期间,2077名年轻成年患者(年龄15 - 34岁)中有1872名(90%)在诊断时采集了血样。1869名患者在诊断时检测了胰岛抗体,1522名患者在诊断后检测了空腹血浆C肽(fpC - 肽),而1743名患者测定了HLA - DQB1基因型。
在临床诊断为1型糖尿病的患者中,83%检测到胰岛抗体;2型糖尿病患者中,23%检测到胰岛抗体;无法分类的糖尿病患者中,45%检测到胰岛抗体。诊断后,有胰岛抗体的患者的中位fpC - 肽浓度明显低于无胰岛抗体的患者(0.24对0.69 nmol/l,p<0.0001)。无论临床分类如何,与无胰岛抗体的患者相比,有胰岛抗体的患者至少有一种风险相关HLA - DQB1基因型的频率增加。有风险相关HLA - DQB1基因型的抗体阴性患者的中位fpC - 肽浓度明显低于无风险相关基因型的患者(0.51对0.74 nmol/l,p = 0.0003)。
结论/解读:评估胰岛抗体对于糖尿病患者的病因分类是必要的。HLA - DQB1基因分型并不能改善有胰岛抗体患者的分类。然而,在无胰岛抗体的患者中,HLA - DQB1基因分型与C肽测量一起可能有助于区分特发性1型糖尿病和2型糖尿病。