Helvig Todd M, Sobell Linda Carter, Sobell Mark B, Simco Edward R
Center for Psychological Studies, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2006 Jun;20(2):219-24. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.2.219.
In this study, the authors used cigarette smokers' narratives describing their quit attempts to understand factors related to the change process. Maintained quitters (MQs, n = 59) and temporary quitters (TQs, n = 47) wrote autobiographical narratives describing their most serious (TQs) or last (MQs) quit attempt. Two types of content analysis were used to analyze the reports: (a) dichotomous ratings of the presence or absence of an event and (b) computerized content analysis of event or word frequency. The valence (anti- or pro-smoking cessation) of change factors was also examined. MQs wrote significantly more affective statements than did TQs. When valence was examined, MQs made significantly more pro-smoking cessation social support, cognitive, and affective statements than TQs did, and TQs made significantly more anti-smoking cessation social support and affective statements than MQs did.
在本研究中,作者利用吸烟者描述其戒烟尝试的叙述来了解与改变过程相关的因素。持续戒烟者(MQs,n = 59)和临时戒烟者(TQs,n = 47)撰写了自传体叙述,描述他们最认真的(TQs)或最后的(MQs)戒烟尝试。使用两种类型的内容分析来分析这些报告:(a)对事件存在与否的二分法评级,以及(b)对事件或词频的计算机化内容分析。还研究了改变因素的效价(反戒烟或支持戒烟)。MQs撰写的情感陈述明显多于TQs。在考察效价时,MQs做出的支持戒烟的社会支持、认知和情感陈述明显多于TQs,而TQs做出的反戒烟社会支持和情感陈述明显多于MQs。