Dunn Jeffrey D, Cannon Eric, Mitchell Matthew P, Curtiss Frederic R
SelectHealth, 4646 West Lake Park Blvd., Suite N3, Salt Lake City, Utah 84120, USA.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 May;12(4):294-302. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.4.294.
Antidepressants do not differ significantly in their ability to treat depression. Excluding the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), these drugs also do not differ significantly in their incidence of adverse events. Therefore, the initial choice of antidepressant medication should be based, in part, on cost. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact on utilization and costs of a generic steptherapy edit for antidepressant drugs excluding TCAs in a health maintenance organization (HMO) in an integrated health system (IHS).
The pharmacy department of the 440,000-member HMO in an IHS collaborated with the Behavioral Health Clinical Program to design an intervention that required generic antidepressants as first-line pharmacotherapy. Under the GenericStart! Program, a brand-name antidepressant was covered only after trial with a generic antidepressant, excluding TCAs. A step-therapy edit was added to the pharmacy claims processing system on January 1, 2005. All new starts, defined as members with no claims history of antidepressant treatment within the preceding 6 months, were required to use a generic antidepressant. The member copayment was waived for the first prescription. All generic antidepressants were in tier 1 of the drug formulary, with an average copayment of $5 to $10. All brand-name antidepressants were in either tier 2 (preferred brand), with an average copayment of $20 to $25 or 25% coinsurance, or tier 3 (nonformulary brand), with an average copayment of $40 to $45 or 50% coinsurance. Pharmacy claims data from a national pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) without interventions for antidepressants in 2004 or 2005 were used for the comparison group.
The generic antidepressant dispensing rate increased by 20 points (32.5% to 52.5%) in the intervention group but only 7.4 points (24.9% to 32.3%) in the comparison group in 2005 compared with 2004. The principal measure of antidepressant drug cost per day of therapy in the intervention group decreased by 11.7% (from $2.40 to $2.12) in 2005 compared with 2004 versus a 2.7% decrease (from $2.60 to $2.53) in the comparison group (P <0.001). Days of antidepressant drug therapy per member per month (PMPM) dropped by 1.5% (from 1.74 to 1.71) in the intervention group versus a decrease of 5.0% (from 1.37 to 1.30) in the comparison group in 2005 compared with 2004. The combination of change in drug cost and utilization resulted in a 13.0% decrease in antidepressant drug cost, from $4.16 PMPM in 2004 to $3.62 in 2005, compared with a 7.6% decrease (from $3.57 to $3.30 PMPM) in the comparison group. The 9.0% difference in drug cost per day represents drug cost savings of approximately $0.36 PMPM or $1,880,562 in 2005 dollars for this HMO of approximately 440,000 members.
A step-therapy edit requiring HMO members to use a generic antidepressant, excluding tricyclics, prior to use of a brand-name antidepressant resulted in drug cost savings of 9.0% for the entire class of antidepressants, equal to $1,880,562 ($0.36 PMPM) in 2005 dollars in the first year of the intervention. A small (-1.5%) decrease in use of antidepressants occurred in the intervention group, which was less than the 5.0% decrease in utilization of antidepressants in the comparison group.
抗抑郁药在治疗抑郁症的能力上并无显著差异。除三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)外,这些药物在不良事件发生率方面也没有显著差异。因此,抗抑郁药物的初始选择部分应基于成本。本研究的目的是评估在综合健康系统(IHS)中的健康维护组织(HMO)里,针对除TCA外的抗抑郁药物进行通用阶梯治疗编辑对药物使用和成本的影响。
IHS中一个拥有44万成员的HMO的药房部门与行为健康临床项目合作,设计了一项干预措施,要求将通用抗抑郁药作为一线药物治疗。在“通用启动!”项目下,只有在试用通用抗抑郁药(不包括TCA)后,才会涵盖品牌抗抑郁药。2005年1月1日,药房理赔处理系统添加了阶梯治疗编辑。所有新开始用药的患者,定义为在过去6个月内没有抗抑郁治疗理赔记录的成员,都必须使用通用抗抑郁药。首剂处方免除成员自付费用。所有通用抗抑郁药都在药品处方集的第1层,平均自付费用为5至10美元。所有品牌抗抑郁药要么在第2层(首选品牌),平均自付费用为20至25美元或25%的共付保险,要么在第3层(非处方品牌),平均自付费用为40至45美元或50%的共付保险。来自国家药房福利管理机构(PBM)的2004年和2005年未进行抗抑郁药干预的药房理赔数据用于对照组。
与2004年相比,2005年干预组通用抗抑郁药的配药率提高了20个百分点(从32.5%提高到52.5%),而对照组仅提高了7.4个百分点(从24.9%提高到32.3%)。与2004年相比,2005年干预组抗抑郁药物每日治疗成本的主要指标下降了11.7%(从2.40美元降至2.12美元),而对照组下降了2.7%(从2.60美元降至2.53美元)(P<0.001)。2005年与2004年相比,干预组每名成员每月抗抑郁药物治疗天数(PMPM)下降了1.5%(从1.74天降至1.71天),而对照组下降了5.0%(从1.37天降至1.30天)。药物成本和使用量变化的综合结果导致抗抑郁药物成本下降了13.0%,从2004年的4.16美元PMPM降至2005年的3.62美元,而对照组下降了7.6%(从3.57美元PMPM降至3.30美元)。每日药物成本9.0%的差异代表了该约44万成员的HMO在2005年节省了约0.36美元PMPM或1,880,562美元的药物成本。
一项要求HMO成员在使用品牌抗抑郁药之前先使用通用抗抑郁药(不包括三环类)的阶梯治疗编辑,使整个抗抑郁药类别在干预的第一年节省了9.0%的药物成本,按2005年美元计算相当于1,880,562美元(0.36美元PMPM)。干预组抗抑郁药使用量出现了小幅(-1.5%)下降,低于对照组抗抑郁药使用量5.0%的下降幅度。