Suppr超能文献

与遵循美国国家质量保证委员会(NCQA)医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)抗抑郁药物管理措施相关的更高成本和治疗因素:行政索赔分析

Higher costs and therapeutic factors associated with adherence to NCQA HEDIS antidepressant medication management measures: analysis of administrative claims.

作者信息

Robinson Rebecca L, Long Stacy R, Chang Stella, Able Stephen, Baser Onur, Obenchain Robert L, Swindle Ralph W

机构信息

Outcomes Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.

出版信息

J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 Jan-Feb;12(1):43-54. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.1.43.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the type of antidepressant drug is related to adherence to National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) Antidepressant Medication Management (AMM) quality measures and to assess the 6-month health care costs among newly diagnosed depressed patients.

METHODS

The MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounter database for medical and pharmacy claims from January 2001 to September 2004 was used to assess adherence to the 3 AMM quality-of-care measures. AMM measures include (a) acute phase, the percentage of eligible members who remained on antidepressant medication continuously for 3 months after the initial diagnosis as determined by at least 84 days supply of antidepressant drugs during the first 114 days following receipt of the index antidepressant; (b) continuation phase, the percentage of eligible members who remained on antidepressant medication continuously for the 6 months after the initial diagnosis as determined by at least 180 days supply of antidepressants during the first 214 days following receipt of the index antidepressant; and (c) practitioner contacts, the percentage of members who received at least 3 follow-up office visits or telephone contacts with health care providers, including at least 1 contact with a practitioner licensed to prescribe (may not necessarily be the prescriber of the antidepressant). A fourth measure, overall adherence, was added, if all 3 AMM measures were met. Multivariate regression models determined demographic, clinical (such as receipt of mental health specialty care, the Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and co-occurring bipolar or schizophrenia), and therapy-related factors associated with outcomes of adherence and costs (paid amounts for insurance-reimbursable health care services for inpatient admissions, emergency department services, outpatient services, and outpatient prescription drugs). Health care expenditures (both total and mental-health-specific costs) were measured for each patient for 6 months following the date of service for the index antidepressant.

RESULTS

A total of 60,386 adult patients (10.7%) of 562,898 patients with a depression diagnosis met NCQA inclusion criteria in the AMM Technical Specifications (e.g., aged 18 years or older, newly diagnosed with depression and initiating antidepressant therapy, 365 days of continuous enrollment; patients were excluded if there were missing data on dose or quantity of index drug in pharmacy claims or initiated therapy on 2 or more antidepressants as the index medication, exclusion criteria not in the AMM Technical Specifications). Only 19% of patients achieved overall adherence. Rates for the 3 AMM measures were 39% for practitioner contacts, 65% for acute phase, and 44% for continuation phase. Receipt of mental health specialty care was the only factor that was positively associated with greater adherence on all 4 measures (overall measure: odds ratio [OR]=3.895, 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.72-4.07; acute OR=1.38, 95% CI, 1.33-1.43; continuation OR=1.46, 95% CI, 1.41-1.51; contacts OR=5.83, 95% CI, 5.62-6.06). Most patients were initiated on selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs, 69.5%), followed by venlafaxine (21.4%), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs, 21.4%), bupropion (11.0%), and other antidepressants (e.g., mirtazapine, nefazadone, trazadone; 7.2%). Before adjustment for confounding factors, patients initiated on venlafaxine, TCAs, or other antidepressants had higher rates of adherence on the overall performance measure versus initiators on SSRIs, but the absolute differences were relatively small: 21.4% for venlafaxine and TCAs and 23.1% for other antidepressants versus 18.5% for SSRIs (P <0.001). Patients initiated on venlafaxine, TCAs, or other antidepressants were also more likely to receive care from a mental health specialist, 16.8%, 15.0%, and 54.8%, respectively, compared with SSRIs (13.0%, all P <0.001). Regression analysis showed that only venlafaxine had a higher OR (1.13; 95% CI, 1.05-1.22) compared with SSRIs for adherence on the overall measure. Initiating dose level was in the target range for 70.0% of all patients (24.9% were below target dose and 5.2% above target dose), and adherent patients on all 3 AMM measures were less likely than nonadherent patients (70.4% vs. 68.4%, P <0.001) to be initiated in the target dose range. After multivariate adjustment, the initiating dose (target vs. high) was a significant factor in explaining adherence to the overall measure (OR=1.26; 95% CI, 1.16- 1.37). Adherent patients had 6-month median unadjusted total health care expenses that were nearly 2 times higher compared with nonadherent patients ($5,169 vs. $2,734) and mental health expenditures that were nearly 3 times higher ($1,922 vs. $677). After adjustment, adherent patients compared with nonadherent patients incurred an additional $644 in mental health expenditures and $806 in overall health care expenditures in the 6 months following initiation of antidepressant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 19% of depressed patients initiated on antidepressants met all 3 criteria set forth in the NCQA Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) AMM quality-of-care performance measures. Receipt of mental health specialty care was the single factor most strongly associated with quality treatment by these measures. Type and dosage level of initial antidepressant was associated with adherence to the NCQA HEDIS AMM measures, but the absolute difference in rates of adherence were relatively small among types of antidepressants. Costs were higher for guideline-adherent individuals in the 6 months following treatment initiation. These analyses were limited to administrative claims that lack indicators of depression disease severity.

摘要

目的

确定抗抑郁药物类型是否与遵循美国国家质量保证委员会(NCQA)抗抑郁药物管理(AMM)质量指标相关,并评估新诊断抑郁症患者的6个月医疗保健成本。

方法

使用2001年1月至2004年9月的MarketScan商业医疗和药房理赔数据库来评估对3项AMM护理质量指标的遵循情况。AMM指标包括:(a)急性期,在收到索引抗抑郁药物后的前114天内,至少有84天的抗抑郁药物供应,以此确定符合条件的成员在初次诊断后连续服用抗抑郁药物3个月的百分比;(b)延续期,在收到索引抗抑郁药物后的前214天内,至少有180天的抗抑郁药物供应,以此确定符合条件的成员在初次诊断后连续服用抗抑郁药物6个月的百分比;(c)医生联系,接受至少3次与医疗保健提供者的随访门诊就诊或电话联系的成员百分比,包括至少1次与有处方权的医生的联系(不一定是抗抑郁药物的开处方者)。如果满足所有3项AMM指标,则添加第四项指标,即总体遵循率。多变量回归模型确定了与遵循率和成本结果(住院入院、急诊科服务、门诊服务和门诊处方药的保险可报销医疗保健服务支付金额)相关的人口统计学、临床(如接受心理健康专科护理、查尔森合并症指数评分以及同时发生的双相情感障碍或精神分裂症)和治疗相关因素。在索引抗抑郁药物服务日期后的6个月内,为每位患者测量医疗保健支出(包括总支出和特定心理健康成本)。

结果

在562,898例诊断为抑郁症的患者中,共有60,386例成年患者(10.7%)符合AMM技术规范中的NCQA纳入标准(例如,年龄在18岁及以上,新诊断为抑郁症并开始抗抑郁治疗,连续参保365天;如果药房理赔中索引药物的剂量或数量数据缺失,或开始使用2种或更多抗抑郁药物作为索引药物,则排除患者,AMM技术规范中未提及的排除标准)。只有19%的患者实现了总体遵循。3项AMM指标的遵循率分别为:医生联系为39%,急性期为65%,延续期为44%。接受心理健康专科护理是与所有4项指标的更高遵循率呈正相关的唯一因素(总体指标:优势比[OR]=3.895,95%置信区间[CI],3.72 - 4.07;急性期OR=1.38,95% CI,1.33 - 1.43;延续期OR=1.46,95% CI,1.41 - 1.51;联系OR=5.83,95% CI,5.62 - 6.06)。大多数患者开始使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI,69.5%),其次是文拉法辛(21.4%)、三环类抗抑郁药(TCA,21.4%)、安非他酮(11.%)和其他抗抑郁药(如米氮平、奈法唑酮、曲唑酮;7.2%)。在调整混杂因素之前,开始使用文拉法辛、TCA或其他抗抑郁药的患者在总体性能指标上的遵循率高于开始使用SSRI的患者,但绝对差异相对较小:文拉法辛和TCA为21.4%,其他抗抑郁药为23.1%,而SSRI为18.5%(P<0.001)。开始使用文拉法辛、TCA或其他抗抑郁药的患者也更有可能接受心理健康专科医生的治疗,分别为16.8%、15.0%和54.8%,而使用SSRI的患者为13.0%(所有P<0.001)。回归分析表明,与SSRI相比,仅文拉法辛在总体指标上的遵循率具有更高的OR(1.13;95% CI,1.05 - 1.22)。所有患者中有70.0%的起始剂量水平在目标范围内(24.9%低于目标剂量,5.2%高于目标剂量),并且在所有3项AMM指标上遵循的患者比不遵循的患者(70.4%对68.4%,P<0.001)更不可能在目标剂量范围内开始治疗。经过多变量调整后,起始剂量(目标剂量与高剂量)是解释总体指标遵循率的一个重要因素(OR=1.26;95% CI,1.16 - 1.37)。遵循的患者在未调整的6个月总医疗保健费用中位数几乎是非遵循患者的2倍(5169美元对2734美元),心理健康支出几乎是非遵循患者的3倍(1922美元对677美元)。调整后,与非遵循患者相比,遵循的患者在开始抗抑郁治疗后的6个月内心理健康支出额外增加644美元,总医疗保健支出额外增加806美元。

结论

开始使用抗抑郁药的抑郁症患者中,只有19%符合NCQA健康计划雇主数据与信息集(HEDIS)AMM护理质量性能指标中规定的所有3项标准。接受心理健康专科护理是这些指标中与优质治疗最密切相关的单一因素。初始抗抑郁药的类型和剂量水平与遵循NCQA HEDIS AMM指标相关,但抗抑郁药类型之间的遵循率绝对差异相对较小。治疗开始后的6个月内,遵循指南的个体成本更高。这些分析仅限于缺乏抑郁症疾病严重程度指标的行政理赔数据。

相似文献

6
One-year costs of second-line therapies for depression.抑郁症二线治疗的一年成本。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2000 Apr;61(4):290-8. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v61n0409.

引用本文的文献

7
Treatment Initiation for New Episodes of Depression in Primary Care Settings.在初级保健环境中开始治疗新发作的抑郁症。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Aug;33(8):1283-1291. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4297-2. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验