Vlahiotis Anna, Devine Scott T, Eichholz Jeff, Kautzner Adam
Health Services Research, Express Scripts, Inc., 4600 N. Hanley Rd, St. Louis, MO 63121, USA.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Mar;17(2):123-32. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.2.123.
Generic antidepressants offer significant prescription drug cost savings compared with brand-name antidepressants, but critics of managed care interventions promoting generic medication use suggest that some generic antidepressants are not as safe or effective as the brand alternatives.
To assess (a) rates of discontinuation of the initially dispensed medication and (b) disease-specific and total health care costs and pharmacy costs, comparing patients who initiated therapy with brand versus generic selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) or selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI).
Antidepressant users aged 18 to 64 years with no pharmacy claims for an SSRI/SNRI in the 180 days prior to the start of SSRI/SNRI therapy (baseline) were identified in the MarketScan database between July 1, 2005, and June 30, 2007, and were followed for 180 days (followup). All study patients met the following criteria: (a) continuously eligible from baseline through follow-up; (b) at least 1 medical claim with a primary or secondary diagnosis of major depressive disorder (ICD-9-CM codes 296.2 or 296.3) in either the baseline or follow-up period; and (c) no pharmacy claims for antipsychotic medications in the baseline period. For brand versus generic antidepressant initiators, logistic regression was used to determine the odds of 6-month therapy discontinuation, defined as no medication refills or absence of a refill for the initially dispensed medication within 1.5 times the days supply dispensed, adjusted for important covariates. Costs were measured as total plan allowed charges including member cost share. Adjusted mean (least squares means holding covariates at mean values) all-cause medical costs, disease-specific (claims with a ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for major depressive disorder in the primary or secondary diagnosis field) medical costs, all-cause pharmacy costs, and SSRI/SNRI antidepressant costs were compared for brand versus generic initiators using generalized linear regression models, also adjusted for baseline covariates.
Of 16,659 new SSRI/SNRI users, 47.8% (n=7,955) initiated a brand-name medication and 52.2% (n=8,704) initiated a generic product. Of the 7,955 who initiated a brand-name antidepressant, 46.8% (n=3,723) discontinued the initially dispensed drug within 180 days, compared with 44.2% (n=3,843) of the 8,704 who initiated a generic. The adjusted odds of discontinuation among generic and brand drug users did not significantly differ (odds ratio [OR]=1.09, 95% CI=0.98-1.22). Adjusted all-cause 6-month average health care costs in patients initiating therapy on a generic antidepressant were $3,660 (95% CI=$3,538-$3,787) compared with $4,587 (95% CI=$4,422-$4,757) for patients initiating on a brand-name antidepressant. Adjusted average 6-month SSRI/SNRI antidepressant costs were 43.7% lower in patients initiating on a generic drug ($174 vs. $309).
The likelihood of discontinuation was similar for patients who initiated therapy with brand or generic antidepressants, and shortterm health care costs and pharmacy costs were lower in patients starting a generic SSRI/SNRI. The results suggest that the use of generic antidepressants as first-line agents in the treatment of major depressive disorder is associated with continuation rates similar to initiation with brand antidepressants but with lower health care costs.
与品牌抗抑郁药相比,通用型抗抑郁药可显著节省处方药成本,但对促进使用通用型药物的管理式医疗干预措施持批评态度的人认为,某些通用型抗抑郁药不如品牌替代药物安全或有效。
评估(a)最初配发药物的停药率,以及(b)疾病特定和总医疗保健成本及药房成本,比较开始使用品牌与通用型选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)或选择性去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)进行治疗的患者。
在2005年7月1日至2007年6月30日期间的MarketScan数据库中,识别出年龄在18至64岁之间、在开始SSRI/SNRI治疗(基线)前180天内没有SSRI/SNRI药房报销记录的抗抑郁药使用者,并对其进行180天的随访(随访期)。所有研究患者均符合以下标准:(a)从基线到随访期持续符合条件;(b)在基线期或随访期至少有1份主要或次要诊断为重度抑郁症(ICD-9-CM编码296.2或296.3)的医疗报销记录;(c)基线期没有抗精神病药物的药房报销记录。对于品牌与通用型抗抑郁药起始使用者,使用逻辑回归来确定6个月治疗停药的几率,定义为在最初配发药物的供应天数的1.5倍内没有药物再填充或没有再填充,对重要协变量进行调整。成本以包括会员成本分担在内的计划允许总费用来衡量。使用广义线性回归模型比较品牌与通用型起始使用者的调整后平均(将协变量保持在平均值的最小二乘均值)全因医疗成本、疾病特定(主要或次要诊断字段中具有ICD-9-CM诊断代码的重度抑郁症报销记录)医疗成本、全因药房成本和SSRI/SNRI抗抑郁药成本,也对基线协变量进行了调整。
在16,659名新的SSRI/SNRI使用者中,47.8%(n = 7,955)开始使用品牌药物,52.2%(n = 8,704)开始使用通用型产品。在开始使用品牌抗抑郁药的7,955人中,46.8%(n = 3,723)在180天内停用了最初配发的药物,而在开始使用通用型药物的8,704人中,这一比例为44.2%(n = 3,843)。通用型和品牌药物使用者停药的调整后几率没有显著差异(优势比[OR] = 1.09,95%置信区间 = 0.98 - 1.22)。开始使用通用型抗抑郁药进行治疗的患者调整后的6个月全因平均医疗保健成本为3,660美元(95%置信区间 = 3,538 - 3,787美元),而开始使用品牌抗抑郁药的患者为4,587美元(95%置信区间 = 4,422 - 4,757美元)。开始使用通用型药物的患者调整后的6个月SSRI/SNRI抗抑郁药平均成本低43.7%(174美元对309美元)。
开始使用品牌或通用型抗抑郁药进行治疗的患者停药可能性相似,开始使用通用型SSRI/SNRI的患者短期医疗保健成本和药房成本较低。结果表明,在治疗重度抑郁症时使用通用型抗抑郁药作为一线药物与使用品牌抗抑郁药起始治疗的持续率相似,但医疗保健成本较低。