• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Discontinuation rates and health care costs in adult patients starting generic versus brand SSRI or SNRI antidepressants in commercial health plans.在商业健康保险计划中,开始使用通用型与品牌型选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)或5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)抗抑郁药的成年患者的停药率和医疗保健成本。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Mar;17(2):123-32. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.2.123.
2
Pharmacy and medical costs associated with switching between venlafaxine and SSRI antidepressant therapy for the treatment of major depressive disorder.文拉法辛与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)抗抑郁治疗药物相互转换治疗重度抑郁症的药学及医疗成本。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Jun;14(5):426-41. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.5.426.
3
Comparative assessment of adherence measures and resource use in SSRI/SNRI-treated patients with depression using second-generation antipsychotics or L-methylfolate as adjunctive therapy.使用第二代抗精神病药物或L-甲基叶酸作为辅助疗法对接受SSRI/SNRI治疗的抑郁症患者的依从性措施和资源利用进行比较评估。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2014 Jan;20(1):76-85. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.1.76.
4
Economic impact of therapeutic substitution of a brand selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with an alternative generic selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in patients with major depressive disorder.治疗性替代品牌选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与替代通用选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗重度抑郁症患者的经济影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Apr;45(4):441-51. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P482. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
5
Higher costs and therapeutic factors associated with adherence to NCQA HEDIS antidepressant medication management measures: analysis of administrative claims.与遵循美国国家质量保证委员会(NCQA)医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)抗抑郁药物管理措施相关的更高成本和治疗因素:行政索赔分析
J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 Jan-Feb;12(1):43-54. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.1.43.
6
Comparison of treatment persistence, hospital utilization and costs among major depressive disorder geriatric patients treated with escitalopram versus other SSRI/SNRI antidepressants.艾司西酞普兰与其他SSRI/SNRI抗抑郁药治疗老年重度抑郁症患者的治疗持续性、医院利用率及成本比较
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Oct;24(10):2805-13. doi: 10.1185/03007990802336780. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
7
Antidepressant class, age, and the risk of deliberate self-harm: a propensity score matched cohort study of SSRI and SNRI users in the USA.抗抑郁药类别、年龄与蓄意自伤风险:美国 SSRI 和 SNRIs 使用者的倾向评分匹配队列研究。
CNS Drugs. 2014 Jan;28(1):79-88. doi: 10.1007/s40263-013-0120-8.
8
Drug Expenditure, Price, and Utilization in the U.S. Medicaid: A Trend Analysis for SSRI and SNRI Antidepressants from 1991 to 2018.美国医疗补助计划中的药物支出、价格和利用情况:SSRIs 和 SNRIs 抗抑郁药 1991 年至 2018 年的趋势分析。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2021 Mar 1;24(1):3-11.
9
Impact of initiation timing of SSRI or SNRI on depressed adolescent healthcare utilization and costs.SSRIs 或 SNRIs 起始时间对抑郁青少年医疗保健利用和成本的影响。
J Med Econ. 2011;14(4):508-15. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.593602. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
10
Differences in medication adherence and healthcare resource utilization patterns: older versus newer antidepressant agents in patients with depression and/or anxiety disorders.药物依从性和医疗资源利用模式的差异:老年与新型抗抑郁药在抑郁症和/或焦虑症患者中的应用
CNS Drugs. 2008;22(11):963-73. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200822110-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Different Antidepressants in Preventing Psychiatric Rehospitalization.不同抗抑郁药预防精神科再住院效果的比较
Cureus. 2024 Dec 22;16(12):e76200. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76200. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Pharmacoeconomic implications of preference toward reference- versus generic-brand antidepressants in primary care.在初级保健中,患者对参照品牌与仿制药品牌抗抑郁药的偏好所产生的药物经济学影响。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Sep 20;25:e40. doi: 10.1017/S1463423624000276.
3
Sociodemographic and clinical predictors of adherence to antidepressants in depressive disorders: a systematic review with a meta-analysis.抑郁症患者抗抑郁药依从性的社会人口学和临床预测因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 22;15:1327155. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1327155. eCollection 2024.
4
Paroxetine treatment in an animal model of depression improves sperm quality.帕罗西汀治疗抑郁动物模型可改善精子质量。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 8;17(12):e0271217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271217. eCollection 2022.
5
An Oppositional Tolerance Account for Potential Cognitive Deficits Caused by the Discontinuation of Antidepressant Drugs.抗抑郁药停药导致潜在认知缺陷的对立耐受解释。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2021 Nov;54(6):252-260. doi: 10.1055/a-1520-4784. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
6
The efficacy of real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback for psychiatric illness: A meta-analysis of brain and behavioral outcomes.实时功能磁共振成像神经反馈治疗精神疾病的疗效:脑与行为结果的荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Feb;121:291-306. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.020. Epub 2020 Dec 25.
7
Association Between Adverse Events and Discontinuation of Antiepileptic Drugs Among Drug-Naïve Adults with Epilepsy.初治癫痫成年患者中不良事件与抗癫痫药物停药之间的关联
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2021 Mar;8(1):5-14. doi: 10.1007/s40801-020-00216-5. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
8
Compliance With Fluoxetine Use in Men With Primary Premature Ejaculation.男性原发性早泄患者中氟西汀的使用依从性。
J Sex Med. 2019 Dec;16(12):1895-1899. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.09.017. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
9
Cost-effectiveness of Electroconvulsive Therapy vs Pharmacotherapy/Psychotherapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression in the United States.美国治疗抵抗性抑郁症中电抽搐治疗与药物治疗/心理治疗的成本效益比较。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;75(7):713-722. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0768.
10
Evaluation of a Clinical Pharmacist-Led Multidisciplinary Antidepressant Telemonitoring Service in the Primary Care Setting.在初级保健环境中对临床药师主导的多学科抗抑郁药物远程监测服务的评估。
Popul Health Manag. 2018 Oct;21(5):366-372. doi: 10.1089/pop.2017.0144. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

在商业健康保险计划中,开始使用通用型与品牌型选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)或5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)抗抑郁药的成年患者的停药率和医疗保健成本。

Discontinuation rates and health care costs in adult patients starting generic versus brand SSRI or SNRI antidepressants in commercial health plans.

作者信息

Vlahiotis Anna, Devine Scott T, Eichholz Jeff, Kautzner Adam

机构信息

Health Services Research, Express Scripts, Inc., 4600 N. Hanley Rd, St. Louis, MO 63121, USA.

出版信息

J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Mar;17(2):123-32. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.2.123.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.2.123
PMID:21348545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10438239/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Generic antidepressants offer significant prescription drug cost savings compared with brand-name antidepressants, but critics of managed care interventions promoting generic medication use suggest that some generic antidepressants are not as safe or effective as the brand alternatives.

OBJECTIVE

To assess (a) rates of discontinuation of the initially dispensed medication and (b) disease-specific and total health care costs and pharmacy costs, comparing patients who initiated therapy with brand versus generic selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) or selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI).

METHODS

Antidepressant users aged 18 to 64 years with no pharmacy claims for an SSRI/SNRI in the 180 days prior to the start of SSRI/SNRI therapy (baseline) were identified in the MarketScan database between July 1, 2005, and June 30, 2007, and were followed for 180 days (followup). All study patients met the following criteria: (a) continuously eligible from baseline through follow-up; (b) at least 1 medical claim with a primary or secondary diagnosis of major depressive disorder (ICD-9-CM codes 296.2 or 296.3) in either the baseline or follow-up period; and (c) no pharmacy claims for antipsychotic medications in the baseline period. For brand versus generic antidepressant initiators, logistic regression was used to determine the odds of 6-month therapy discontinuation, defined as no medication refills or absence of a refill for the initially dispensed medication within 1.5 times the days supply dispensed, adjusted for important covariates. Costs were measured as total plan allowed charges including member cost share. Adjusted mean (least squares means holding covariates at mean values) all-cause medical costs, disease-specific (claims with a ICD-9-CM diagnosis code for major depressive disorder in the primary or secondary diagnosis field) medical costs, all-cause pharmacy costs, and SSRI/SNRI antidepressant costs were compared for brand versus generic initiators using generalized linear regression models, also adjusted for baseline covariates.

RESULTS

Of 16,659 new SSRI/SNRI users, 47.8% (n=7,955) initiated a brand-name medication and 52.2% (n=8,704) initiated a generic product. Of the 7,955 who initiated a brand-name antidepressant, 46.8% (n=3,723) discontinued the initially dispensed drug within 180 days, compared with 44.2% (n=3,843) of the 8,704 who initiated a generic. The adjusted odds of discontinuation among generic and brand drug users did not significantly differ (odds ratio [OR]=1.09, 95% CI=0.98-1.22). Adjusted all-cause 6-month average health care costs in patients initiating therapy on a generic antidepressant were $3,660 (95% CI=$3,538-$3,787) compared with $4,587 (95% CI=$4,422-$4,757) for patients initiating on a brand-name antidepressant. Adjusted average 6-month SSRI/SNRI antidepressant costs were 43.7% lower in patients initiating on a generic drug ($174 vs. $309).

CONCLUSIONS

The likelihood of discontinuation was similar for patients who initiated therapy with brand or generic antidepressants, and shortterm health care costs and pharmacy costs were lower in patients starting a generic SSRI/SNRI. The results suggest that the use of generic antidepressants as first-line agents in the treatment of major depressive disorder is associated with continuation rates similar to initiation with brand antidepressants but with lower health care costs.

摘要

背景

与品牌抗抑郁药相比,通用型抗抑郁药可显著节省处方药成本,但对促进使用通用型药物的管理式医疗干预措施持批评态度的人认为,某些通用型抗抑郁药不如品牌替代药物安全或有效。

目的

评估(a)最初配发药物的停药率,以及(b)疾病特定和总医疗保健成本及药房成本,比较开始使用品牌与通用型选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)或选择性去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)进行治疗的患者。

方法

在2005年7月1日至2007年6月30日期间的MarketScan数据库中,识别出年龄在18至64岁之间、在开始SSRI/SNRI治疗(基线)前180天内没有SSRI/SNRI药房报销记录的抗抑郁药使用者,并对其进行180天的随访(随访期)。所有研究患者均符合以下标准:(a)从基线到随访期持续符合条件;(b)在基线期或随访期至少有1份主要或次要诊断为重度抑郁症(ICD-9-CM编码296.2或296.3)的医疗报销记录;(c)基线期没有抗精神病药物的药房报销记录。对于品牌与通用型抗抑郁药起始使用者,使用逻辑回归来确定6个月治疗停药的几率,定义为在最初配发药物的供应天数的1.5倍内没有药物再填充或没有再填充,对重要协变量进行调整。成本以包括会员成本分担在内的计划允许总费用来衡量。使用广义线性回归模型比较品牌与通用型起始使用者的调整后平均(将协变量保持在平均值的最小二乘均值)全因医疗成本、疾病特定(主要或次要诊断字段中具有ICD-9-CM诊断代码的重度抑郁症报销记录)医疗成本、全因药房成本和SSRI/SNRI抗抑郁药成本,也对基线协变量进行了调整。

结果

在16,659名新的SSRI/SNRI使用者中,47.8%(n = 7,955)开始使用品牌药物,52.2%(n = 8,704)开始使用通用型产品。在开始使用品牌抗抑郁药的7,955人中,46.8%(n = 3,723)在180天内停用了最初配发的药物,而在开始使用通用型药物的8,704人中,这一比例为44.2%(n = 3,843)。通用型和品牌药物使用者停药的调整后几率没有显著差异(优势比[OR] = 1.09,95%置信区间 = 0.98 - 1.22)。开始使用通用型抗抑郁药进行治疗的患者调整后的6个月全因平均医疗保健成本为3,660美元(95%置信区间 = 3,538 - 3,787美元),而开始使用品牌抗抑郁药的患者为4,587美元(95%置信区间 = 4,422 - 4,757美元)。开始使用通用型药物的患者调整后的6个月SSRI/SNRI抗抑郁药平均成本低43.7%(174美元对309美元)。

结论

开始使用品牌或通用型抗抑郁药进行治疗的患者停药可能性相似,开始使用通用型SSRI/SNRI的患者短期医疗保健成本和药房成本较低。结果表明,在治疗重度抑郁症时使用通用型抗抑郁药作为一线药物与使用品牌抗抑郁药起始治疗的持续率相似,但医疗保健成本较低。