Buciuniene Ilona, Stonienë Laimutë, Blazeviciene Aurelija, Kazlauskaite Ruta, Skudiene Vida
Department of Philosophy and social science, Kaunas University of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania.
BMC Public Health. 2006 Jun 22;6:166. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-166.
In the Soviet period, the blood donation system operated in Lithuania exclusively on a remunerative basis. After joining the EU, Lithuania committed itself to meeting the EU requirements to provide all consumers within its boundaries with safe blood products made from voluntary unpaid blood donations. However, the introduction of a non-remunerated donation system may considerably affect donors' motivation and retention. Thus the aim of the current research was to determine blood donation motives among the present donors and investigate their attitude towards non-remunerated donation.
A questionnaire survey of 400 blood donors. Survey data processed using SPSS statistical analysis package. Statistical data reliability checked using Fisher's exact test (p < 0.05).
Paid donors comprised 89.9%, while non-paid ones made 10.1% of the respondents. Research findings show that 93 per cent of the paid donors give blood on a regular basis; while among the non-remunerated donors the same figure amounted merely to 20.6 per cent. The idea of the remuneration necessity is supported by 78.3 per cent of the paid donors, while 64.7 per cent of the non-remunerated respondents believe that remuneration is not necessary. The absolute majority of the paid donors (92%) think they should be offered a monetary compensation for blood donation, while more than half of the non-remunerated donors (55.9) claim they would be content with a mere appreciation of the act. Provided no remuneration were offered, 28.44 per cent of the respondents would carry on doing it, 29.6 per cent would do it only in emergency, 29.6 per cent would donate blood merely for their family or friends, and 12.3 per cent would quit it completely.
Most respondents admitted having donated blood for the following reasons: willingness to help the ill or monetary compensation. Majority would consent to free blood donation only in case of emergency or as a family replacement, which leads to a conclusion that provided monetary remuneration is completely terminated part of the currently active paid donors would withdraw from this activity, which might seriously affect the national supply of blood and its products.
在苏联时期,立陶宛的献血系统完全基于有偿原则运作。加入欧盟后,立陶宛承诺满足欧盟要求,为其境内所有消费者提供由自愿无偿献血制成的安全血液制品。然而,引入无偿献血系统可能会极大地影响献血者的积极性和留存率。因此,当前研究的目的是确定现有献血者的献血动机,并调查他们对无偿献血的态度。
对400名献血者进行问卷调查。使用SPSS统计分析软件包处理调查数据。使用费舍尔精确检验(p < 0.05)检查统计数据的可靠性。
有偿献血者占受访者的89.9%,无偿献血者占10.1%。研究结果表明,93%的有偿献血者定期献血;而在无偿献血者中,这一比例仅为20.6%。78.3%的有偿献血者支持有偿的必要性,而64.7%的无偿受访者认为有偿没有必要。绝大多数有偿献血者(92%)认为他们应该因献血获得金钱补偿,而超过一半的无偿献血者(55.9%)声称他们对仅仅得到对该行为的认可就会满意。如果不提供报酬,28.44%的受访者会继续献血,29.6%的人只会在紧急情况下献血,29.6%的人只会为家人或朋友献血,12.3%的人会完全停止献血。
大多数受访者承认献血的原因如下:愿意帮助病人或获得金钱补偿。大多数人仅在紧急情况下或作为家人替代才会同意无偿献血,这得出一个结论,即如果完全终止金钱报酬,部分目前活跃的有偿献血者将退出这项活动,这可能会严重影响国家血液及其制品的供应。