Logrono Roberto, Bhanot Punam, Chaya Charles, Cao Li, Waxman Irving, Bhutani Manoop S
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-0764, USA.
Cancer. 2006 Aug 25;108(4):257-66. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21918.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) recently have been distinguished morphologically, immunohistochemically, and genetically from other gastrointestinal-tract spindle cell neoplasms. The objective of this study was to correlate clinical and imaging findings with morphology and immunohistochemistry to diagnose GISTs and to differentiate them from other spindle cell lesions in the gastrointestinal tract.
The authors reviewed 9 patients who had tumors that were diagnosed as GIST by image-guided and endosonographic-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with or without core biopsy (7 stomach tumors and 2 intraabdominal tumors). The male:female ratio was 3:6, and the patients ranged in age from 38 years to 80 years. Onsite evaluation, preliminary cytologic evaluation, and immunohistochemistry were provided for 6 patients. Immunostains were performed, depending on sample size, on aspirates and/or core biopsies.
On imaging studies, most tumors were smooth and homogenous, consistent with GIST. Tumors ranged in size from 1.8 cm to 22 cm. The largest neoplasm showed solid/cystic and necrotic components. Aspirates consisted of spindle cell, neoplastic proliferation arranged in fascicles that exhibited focal, nuclear palisading; indistinct, cytoplasmic borders; and no significant atypia or mitosis. Focal epithelioid changes or cytologic atypia and mitoses were observed in 2 tumors. Immunostains revealed tumor expression of CD117 and/or CD34 in 5 of 6 tumors, expression of actin in 3 of 6 tumors, and expression of desmin in 1 of 6 tumors. All tumors were diagnosed as GIST (or consistent with GIST for tumors that lacked immunochemical analysis). Five patients underwent surgical excision, and the GIST diagnosis was confirmed in 3 patients, whereas 1 tumor proved to be neurofibroma, and another tumor was leiomyoma. No surgical follow-up was available for the remaining 4 patients, who had imaging and morphologic findings consistent with GIST.
In the setting of consistent clinical and radiologic findings, the combined use of cytomorphology and immunohistochemistry on FNA and/or core biopsy in most instances provides a reliable pathologic diagnosis of GIST. The need of sufficient material for performing ancillary studies and the usual impossibility of excluding malignancy are limitations of FNA cytology of GIST.
胃肠道间质瘤(GISTs)近来在形态学、免疫组织化学及遗传学方面已与其他胃肠道梭形细胞肿瘤区分开来。本研究的目的是将临床及影像学表现与形态学和免疫组织化学结果相关联,以诊断GISTs,并将其与胃肠道其他梭形细胞病变相鉴别。
作者回顾了9例经影像引导及内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸活检(FNA)(有或无粗针活检)诊断为GIST的患者(7例胃肿瘤和2例腹内肿瘤)。男女比例为3:6,患者年龄范围为38岁至80岁。为6例患者提供了现场评估、初步细胞学评估及免疫组织化学检查。根据样本大小,对抽吸物和/或粗针活检标本进行免疫染色。
在影像学检查中,大多数肿瘤表现为光滑且均匀,符合GIST特征。肿瘤大小从1.8 cm至22 cm不等。最大的肿瘤显示有实性/囊性及坏死成分。抽吸物由梭形细胞构成,肿瘤性增生呈束状排列,可见局灶性核栅栏状排列;胞质边界不清;无明显异型性或核分裂象。2例肿瘤观察到局灶性上皮样改变或细胞学异型性及核分裂象。免疫染色显示6例肿瘤中有5例CD117和/或CD34呈肿瘤表达,6例中有3例肌动蛋白表达,6例中有1例结蛋白表达。所有肿瘤均诊断为GIST(对于缺乏免疫化学分析的肿瘤诊断为符合GIST)。5例患者接受了手术切除,3例患者的GIST诊断得到证实,而1例肿瘤被证明为神经纤维瘤,另1例为平滑肌瘤。其余4例具有与GIST一致的影像学及形态学表现的患者未获得手术随访资料。
在临床及放射学表现一致的情况下,在大多数情况下,FNA和/或粗针活检联合应用细胞形态学及免疫组织化学可对GIST做出可靠的病理诊断。进行辅助检查需要足够的标本以及通常无法排除恶性肿瘤是GIST细针穿刺细胞学检查的局限性。