• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Engineering the behavioral engineer.工程化行为工程师。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Winter;4(4):321-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-321.
2
Adult headbanging: sleep studies and treatment.成人摇头晃脑:睡眠研究与治疗
Sleep. 1996 May;19(4):343-6. doi: 10.1093/sleep/19.4.343.
3
Simulating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation emergencies to improve human performance. Part II: assessment of technical and behavioral skills.模拟体外膜肺氧合紧急情况以提高人员表现。第二部分:技术和行为技能评估。
Simul Healthc. 2006 Winter;1(4):228-32. doi: 10.1097/01.SIH.0000243551.01521.74.
4
A combined cognitive and behavioral intervention for cocaine-using methadone clients.针对使用可卡因的美沙酮治疗患者的认知与行为综合干预措施。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2005 Mar;37(1):75-84. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2005.10399750.
5
Focused but fixed: the impact of expectation of external rewards on inhibitory control and flexibility in preschoolers.专注但固执:期待外部奖励对学龄前儿童抑制控制和灵活性的影响。
Emotion. 2013 Jun;13(3):562-72. doi: 10.1037/a0027263. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
6
A cooperative communication intervention for nursing home staff and family members of residents.针对养老院工作人员和居民家属的合作沟通干预措施。
Gerontologist. 2003 Apr;43 Spec No 2:96-106. doi: 10.1093/geront/43.suppl_2.96.
7
Partners in caregiving in a special care environment: cooperative communication between staff and families on dementia units.特殊护理环境下的照护伙伴:痴呆症护理单元中工作人员与家属之间的合作沟通
Gerontologist. 2007 Aug;47(4):504-15. doi: 10.1093/geront/47.4.504.
8
Operant conditioning in the ant Myrmica sabuleti.蚂蚁Myrmica sabuleti中的操作性条件反射。
Behav Processes. 2004 Nov 30;67(3):417-25. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2004.07.002.
9
A possible social relative reward effect: Influences of outcome inequity between rats during operant responding.一种可能的社会相对奖励效应:操作性反应过程中大鼠之间结果不平等的影响。
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:459-469. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
10
[Influence of Nurses' Self-leadership on Individual and Team Members' Work Role Performance].[护士自我领导力对个体及团队成员工作角色绩效的影响]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2016 Jun;46(3):338-48. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2016.46.3.338.

引用本文的文献

1
The analysis of group contingency data.群组边缘数据的分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Winter;10(4):755-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-755.
2
Effects of implementing a token economy on teacher attending behavior.代币经济实施对教师参与行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Winter;8(4):373-80. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-373.
3
Descriptive analyses of caregiver reprimands.照顾者训斥的描述性分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2005 Fall;38(3):373-83. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2005.118-04.

本文引用的文献

1
MODIFICATION OF SYMPTOMATIC VERBAL BEHAVIOUR OF MENTAL PATIENTS.精神病患者症状性言语行为的改变
Behav Res Ther. 1964 Sep;2:87-97. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(64)90001-4.
2
The psychiatric nurse as a behavioral engineer.作为行为工程师的精神科护士。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Oct;2(4):323-34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1959.2-323.
3
The control of the content of conversation through reinforcement.通过强化来控制对话内容。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jan;4(1):25-30. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-25.
4
Behavioral therapy for "apathy" of hospitalized schizophrenics.住院精神分裂症患者“冷漠”症状的行为疗法
Psychol Rep. 1966 Dec;19(3):1147-58. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.3f.1147.
5
Chronic schizophrenics as behavioral engineers.作为行为工程师的慢性精神分裂症患者。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1971 Jan;152(1):31-44. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197101000-00005.
6
A scale to measure skill in applying behavior modification techniques to the mentally retarded.一种用于衡量将行为矫正技术应用于智障者的技能的量表。
Am J Ment Defic. 1970 Mar;74(5):633-6.
7
Creating therapeutic pyramids using mentally retarded patients.利用智障患者创建治疗金字塔。
Am J Ment Defic. 1969 Nov;74(3):331-7.

工程化行为工程师。

Engineering the behavioral engineer.

机构信息

Kingston Psychiatric Hospital, Kingston, Ontario.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Winter;4(4):321-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-321.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.1971.4-321
PMID:16795309
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1310710/
Abstract

Twenty-eight nursing staff members treated, by operant methods, a simulated headbanging patient. They were randomly assigned to four experimental conditions, involving improvement versus non-improvement of the "patient" and promise of reward versus no promise of reward. The promise of reward significantly improved accuracy of treatment. Improvement of the patient, however, did not improve accuracy.

摘要

28 名护理人员采用操作性方法治疗了一名模拟撞头的患者。他们被随机分配到四个实验条件下,涉及患者的改善与不改善以及是否有奖励承诺。奖励承诺显著提高了治疗的准确性。然而,患者的改善并没有提高准确性。