Suppr超能文献

密集设计的概率模型。

A probabilistic model of intensive designs.

机构信息

University of Minnesota.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Fall;11(3):357-62. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-357.

Abstract

Without internal validity, experimental data are uninterpretable. With intensive designs, most methods presented to quantify a design's internal validity have been subject to criticism. A probabilistic model of intensive designs is presented that demonstrates the high degree of internal validity of these designs without relying on adaptations from traditional inferential statistics. Where the experimenter is able to conform to the restrictions of the model, the equations provide an estimation of internal validity for either reversal or multiple-baseline designs. More importantly, the model provides mathematical bases for some of the common recommendations and design considerations in intensive research (such as the desirability of within-subject replications and of four or more multiple baselines).

摘要

如果没有内部有效性,实验数据就无法解释。对于强化设计,大多数用于量化设计内部有效性的方法都受到了批评。本文提出了一种强化设计的概率模型,该模型无需依赖传统推理统计学的改编,就证明了这些设计具有高度的内部有效性。如果实验者能够符合模型的限制,那么这些方程就可以为反转或多基线设计提供内部有效性的估计。更重要的是,该模型为强化研究中的一些常见建议和设计考虑提供了数学基础(例如,在个体内重复和四个或更多多基线的可取性)。

相似文献

1
A probabilistic model of intensive designs.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Fall;11(3):357-62. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-357.
2
Threats to Internal Validity in Multiple-Baseline Design Variations.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2022 Jan 27;45(3):619-638. doi: 10.1007/s40614-022-00326-1. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Revisiting an Analysis of Threats to Internal Validity in Multiple Baseline Designs.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2022 Jul 26;45(3):681-694. doi: 10.1007/s40614-022-00351-0. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Stated Choice design comparison in a developing country: recall and attribute nonattendance.
Health Econ Rev. 2014 Oct 24;4:25. doi: 10.1186/s13561-014-0025-3. eCollection 2014.
7
8
Single-subject research designs and data analyses for assessing elite athletes' conditioning.
Sports Med. 2004;34(15):1035-50. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434150-00003.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Methodological and assessment considerations in evaluating reinforcement programs in applied settings.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Fall;6(3):517-31. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-517.
2
Some statistical treatments compatible with individual organism methodology.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 May;10(3):319-30. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-319.
3
Single-case experimental designs. Uses in applied clinical research.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1973 Sep;29(3):319-25. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1973.04200030017003.
4
Treatment evaluation issues in research on addictive behaviors.
Addict Behav. 1975 Jul;1(1):23-36. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(75)80015-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验