The Ohio State University.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Fall;11(3):381-93. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-381.
Twelve first-grade students were employed to analyze the effects of (1) Verbal and Visual Feedback, (2) Verbal and Visual Feedback plus immediate rewriting of trained letters with one or more incorrect letter strokes, and (3) Potential Reinforcement on cursive letter strokes. Students practised both a set of trained and a set of untrained letters during each session. Feedback and reinforcement was administered only for trained letter strokes. The percentage of correct trained letter strokes increased during all conditions. Performance on the untrained but practiced and trained letter strokes followed the same general trend in response pattern. No consistent pattern of generalization was demonstrated with untrained and unpracticed letter strokes.
(1)口头和视觉反馈;(2)口头和视觉反馈加上对训练有素的字母中一个或多个错误笔画的即时重写;以及(3)潜在的强化对草书字母笔画的影响。学生在每次练习中都练习了一组训练过的和一组未训练过的字母。仅对训练过的字母笔画给予反馈和强化。在所有条件下,正确的训练字母笔画的比例都有所增加。在反应模式上,对未经训练但已练习过的和训练过的字母笔画的表现也呈现出相同的总体趋势。未受过训练且未练习过的字母笔画没有表现出一致的泛化模式。