The Pennsylvania State University.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Winter;12(4):713-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-713.
A major distinguishing characteristic of behavioral assessment is the direct assessment of overt behavior. Direct assessment is assumed to provide a sample of behavior that reflects client performance in the situation in which behavior is assessed, even if the assessment procedures were not implemented. Yet, in the majority of investigations, behavioral assessment procedures are obtrusive, i.e., subjects are aware that their behavior is being assessed. The potential problem with obtrusive assessment is that it may be reactive, i.e., affect how subjects perform. Recent research has demonstrated that obtrusive observations often are reactive and that behaviors assessed under obtrusive and unobtrusive conditions bear little relation. From methodological and applied perspectives, additional attention needs to be given to unobtrusive measures of behavior change. The present paper illustrates unobtrusive measures in behavior modification including direct observations, archival records, and physical traces of performance. In addition, validation and assessment problems, questions about the obtrusiveness of the measures, and ethical issues are discussed.
行为评估的一个主要特点是对明显行为的直接评估。直接评估假定提供了一个反映客户在评估行为时的表现的行为样本,即使评估程序没有实施。然而,在大多数研究中,行为评估程序是引人注目的,也就是说,被试知道他们的行为正在被评估。引人注目的评估的潜在问题是它可能具有反应性,即影响被试的表现。最近的研究表明,引人注目的观察往往具有反应性,并且在引人注目的和非引人注目的条件下评估的行为几乎没有关系。从方法论和应用的角度来看,需要更多地关注行为变化的非引人注目的测量。本文举例说明了行为修正中的非引人注目的测量方法,包括直接观察、档案记录和绩效的物理痕迹。此外,还讨论了验证和评估问题、测量的干扰性问题以及伦理问题。