• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Computer-assisted observer training.计算机辅助观察者培训。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Spring;20(1):83-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-83.
2
Evaluation of inter-observer agreement when using a clinical respiratory scoring system in pre-weaned dairy calves.在断奶前的奶牛犊中使用临床呼吸评分系统时观察者间一致性的评估。
N Z Vet J. 2016 Jul;64(4):243-7. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2016.1153439. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
3
Intra-observer and inter-observer variability in scoring laparoscopic diagnosis of pelvic adhesions.盆腔粘连腹腔镜诊断评分中的观察者内及观察者间变异性。
Hum Reprod. 1995 Jan;10(1):161-4. doi: 10.1093/humrep/10.1.161.
4
Computer-Assisted Automated Scoring of Polysomnograms Using the Somnolyzer System.使用Somnolyzer系统对多导睡眠图进行计算机辅助自动评分
Sleep. 2015 Oct 1;38(10):1555-66. doi: 10.5665/sleep.5046.
5
Inter- and intraobserver agreement of seizure behavior scoring in the amygdala kindled rat.杏仁核点燃大鼠癫痫发作行为评分的观察者间和观察者内一致性
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Jan;42:10-3. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.10.030. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
6
Automated essay scoring and the future of educational assessment in medical education.自动作文评分与医学教育中教育评估的未来。
Med Educ. 2014 Oct;48(10):950-62. doi: 10.1111/medu.12517.
7
The Paddington International Virtual Chromoendoscopy Score in ulcerative colitis exhibits very good inter-rater agreement after computerized module training: a multicenter study across academic and community practice (with video).经计算机模块培训后,溃疡性结肠炎帕丁顿国际虚拟染色内镜评分的观察者间一致性非常好:一项跨越学术和社区实践的多中心研究(附视频)。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jul;88(1):95-106.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.02.044. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
8
Pre- and post-training session evaluation for interobserver agreement and diagnostic accuracy of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for biliary strictures.术前和术后评估探针共聚焦激光内镜检查胆道狭窄的观察者间一致性和诊断准确性。
Dig Endosc. 2014 Jul;26(4):577-80. doi: 10.1111/den.12214. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
9
Inter-rater reliability of sleep cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) scoring and validation of a new computer-assisted CAP scoring method.睡眠周期交替模式(CAP)评分的评分者间信度及一种新的计算机辅助CAP评分方法的验证
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;116(3):696-707. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.021. Epub 2004 Nov 10.
10
Experienced and inexperienced observers achieved relatively high within-observer agreement on video mobility scoring of dairy cows.经验丰富和缺乏经验的观察者在奶牛视频移动性评分上达成了相对较高的观察者内一致性。
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jul;98(7):4560-71. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9266. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy of paper-and-pencil systematic observation versus computer-aided systems.纸笔系统观察与计算机辅助系统的准确性比较。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Feb;55(2):855-866. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01861-0. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
2
Observer training revisited: a comparison of in vivo and video instruction.观察者训练再探讨:体内和视频指导的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Winter;45(4):827-32. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-827.

本文引用的文献

1
Observation procedure, observer gender, and behavior valence as determinants of sampling error in a behavior assessment analogue.观察程序、观察者性别和行为效价作为行为评估模拟中抽样误差的决定因素。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Fall;13(3):529-36. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-529.
2
A review of the observational data-collection and reliability procedures reported in The Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.《应用行为分析杂志》中报告的观察性数据收集和可靠性程序综述。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Spring;10(1):97-101. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-97.
3
Measuring the reliability of observational data: a reactive process.衡量观测数据的可靠性:一个反应过程。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Spring;6(1):175-84. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-175.

计算机辅助观察者培训。

Computer-assisted observer training.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Spring;20(1):83-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-83.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.1987.20-83
PMID:16795697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1285954/
Abstract

Computerized interactive videotapes were used to train college students to use a 10-second partial-interval observational recording system. Students viewed videotapes and scored response occurrences on a computer keyboard. Incorrect scoring resulted in immediate computerized feedback and rescoring.Two independent variables, three versus seven target behaviors, and maintenance (thinning feedback) versus nonmaintenance (no feedback) training were compared. Average accuracy values across all target behaviors were consistently above 90%, and the lowest accuracy values obtained for most target responses typically met current standards for interobserver agreement. Data indicate the standard practice of occasional observer agreement checks may be inadequate.

摘要

计算机化的交互式录像带被用来培训大学生使用 10 秒部分区间观察记录系统。学生通过观看录像带并在计算机键盘上对反应发生情况进行评分。评分错误会立即得到计算机化的反馈和重新评分。比较了两个独立变量,即三个与七个目标行为,以及维护(减少反馈)与非维护(无反馈)训练。所有目标行为的平均准确率均一直高于 90%,而对于大多数目标反应获得的最低准确率通常符合当前的观察者间一致性标准。数据表明,偶尔进行观察者一致性检查的标准做法可能不够充分。