California State University Stanislaus, USA.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Winter;45(4):827-32. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-827.
We compared the effects of 2 observer-training procedures. In vivo training involved practice during actual treatment sessions. Video training involved practice while watching progressively more complex simulations. Fifty-nine undergraduate students entered 1 of the 2 training conditions sequentially according to an ABABAB design. Results showed that the 2 training methods produced almost identical scores on a posttraining observational test; however, the video method required fewer training sessions to complete.
我们比较了两种观察者训练程序的效果。体内训练包括在实际治疗过程中的练习。视频训练包括在观看逐渐复杂的模拟过程中的练习。59 名本科生按照 ABABAB 设计顺序进入两种训练条件之一。结果表明，两种训练方法在培训后的观察测试中产生了几乎相同的分数；然而，视频方法所需的训练课程更少。
