University of Kansas.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1987 Winter;20(4):313-27. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-313.
Twenty years ago, an anthropological note described the current dimensions of applied behavior analysis as it was prescribed and practiced in 1968: It was, or ought to become, applied, behavioral, analytic, technological, conceptual, effective, and capable of appropriately generalized outcomes. A similar anthropological note today finds the same dimensions still prescriptive, and to an increasing extent, descriptive. Several new tactics have become evident, however, some in the realm of conceptual analysis, some in the sociological status of the discipline, and some in its understanding of the necessary systemic nature of any applied discipline that is to operate in the domain of important human behaviors.
二十年前,一篇人类学笔记描述了当时(1968 年)应用行为分析的规定和实践的当前维度:它是,或者应该成为,应用的、行为的、分析的、技术的、概念的、有效的,并且能够产生适当的概括性结果。今天的一篇类似的人类学笔记发现,同样的维度仍然具有规定性,而且在越来越大的程度上具有描述性。然而,已经出现了一些新的策略,一些是在概念分析领域,一些是在该学科的社会学地位方面,还有一些是在理解任何应用学科的必要系统性质方面,这些学科是要在重要人类行为领域运作的。