Graber Jessica, Graber Abraham
Wildflower Pediatric Psychology LLC, Columbus, OH USA.
Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH USA.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2025 Jun 11;48(3):577-588. doi: 10.1007/s40614-025-00462-4. eCollection 2025 Sep.
In recent years, public concerns about applied behavior analysis (ABA) have intensified. This article argues that foundational principles of ABA require behavior analysts to take seriously these concerns and actively work to improve our practices. We provide an overview of ongoing reform efforts and examine how these efforts have led to the emergence of distinct brands within the field. Although these reformist efforts signal a commitment to ethical progress, they also raise concerns about the proliferation of competing credentials, conferences, and professional affiliations, which could increase confusion among clients, practitioners, and policymakers. We argue that although branding within ABA may be an expected and ultimately benign response to shifting ethical and practical norms, it also carries the potential to faction reformist efforts and further divide the field, rather than promote our collective advancement toward ever-better practices. Thus, our goals are to: (1) raise awareness around the potentialities of siloing advancements under competing labels, and (2) suggest that an integrated approach synthesizing reformist insights into a cohesive framework may have the greatest impact on advancing the whole field's understanding of best practice.
近年来,公众对应用行为分析(ABA)的关注日益加剧。本文认为,ABA的基本原则要求行为分析师认真对待这些关注,并积极努力改进我们的实践。我们概述了正在进行的改革努力,并研究了这些努力如何导致该领域内出现不同的品牌。尽管这些改革努力标志着对道德进步的承诺,但它们也引发了对竞争证书、会议和专业隶属关系激增的担忧,这可能会增加客户、从业者和政策制定者之间的困惑。我们认为,尽管ABA内部的品牌塑造可能是对不断变化的道德和实践规范的一种预期且最终无害的回应,但它也有可能使改革努力陷入派系纷争,并进一步分裂该领域,而不是促进我们朝着更好的实践方向共同进步。因此,我们的目标是:(1)提高人们对在相互竞争的标签下孤立推进的可能性的认识,(2)建议一种将改革见解综合成一个连贯框架的综合方法,可能对推动整个领域对最佳实践的理解产生最大影响。