Carlson Dawn, Ehrlich Nat
US Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Washington, DC 20202-2700, USA.
Assist Technol. 2006 Spring;18(1):77-86. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2006.10131908.
This article provides an overview of who pays for the most commonly used assistive technology devices, special adaptations, and environmental accommodations by persons with disabilities in the United States. The latest findings from the 2001 survey of Use and Need of Assistive Technology and Information Technology by Persons With Disabilities in the United States conducted by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America, and the University of Michigan will be presented and compared to findings from earlier research and reviews of the literature. A modified discriminant function analysis was performed to determine the interaction between the source of payment for assistive technology used by persons with disabilities. In the sample of 1,414 such persons, 901 were found to use some form of assistive technology in their daily lives. Ten distinct sources of payment were specified. Respondents were able to mention up to three sources of payment for each example of assistive technology used. A total of 1,877 sources were mentioned. Overall, the most mentioned payment source was self or other family member in household, accounting for nearly 40% of all sources mentioned. The variables tested were found to have varying levels of interactive potency. Occupational status, education level, severity of impairment, opinion as to the effectiveness of assistive technology, and personal income were significant, whereas age, family income, opinion as to improvement over the past decade, and race were statistically unrelated to source of payment. From the perspective of relative discrimination on the basis of payment source, Medicare stands as the lone significant discriminant source of payment. The authors offer a summary and conclusion based on an integrated view of all available sources of information about payment.
本文概述了在美国由谁来支付残疾人最常用的辅助技术设备、特殊改装及环境便利设施的费用。将展示美国国家残疾与康复研究所、北美康复工程与辅助技术协会以及密歇根大学于2001年开展的美国残疾人辅助技术与信息技术使用及需求调查的最新结果,并与早期研究及文献综述的结果进行比较。进行了修正判别函数分析,以确定残疾人使用的辅助技术支付来源之间的相互作用。在1414名此类人员的样本中,发现901人在日常生活中使用某种形式的辅助技术。确定了10个不同的支付来源。对于所使用的每种辅助技术示例,受访者最多可提及三个支付来源。总共提及了1877个来源。总体而言,提及最多的支付来源是本人或家庭中的其他家庭成员,占所有提及来源的近40%。经测试,变量具有不同程度的交互效力。职业状况、教育水平、损伤严重程度、对辅助技术有效性的看法以及个人收入具有显著意义,而年龄、家庭收入、对过去十年改善情况的看法以及种族在统计学上与支付来源无关。从基于支付来源的相对歧视角度来看,医疗保险是唯一显著的歧视性支付来源。作者基于对所有可用支付信息来源的综合观点给出了总结和结论。