Myaskovsky Larissa, Gao Shasha, Hausmann Leslie R M, Bornemann Kellee R, Burkitt Kelly H, Switzer Galen E, Fine Michael J, Phillips Samuel L, Gater David, Spungen Ann M, Worobey Lynn, Boninger Michael L
Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA; Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Mar;98(3):442-449. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.09.116. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
To assess in Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI) or amputated limb (AL) the following: (1) patient demographics, medical factors, cultural and psychosocial characteristic by race; (2) wheelchair quality by race; and (3) the independent associations of patient race and the other factors with wheelchair quality.
Cross-sectional cohort study.
Three Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers affiliated with academic medical centers.
Eligible participants were Veterans with SCI or ALs (N=516); 482 of them completed the interview. Analyses were restricted to white and African American participants. Because there was no variation in wheelchair quality among AL patients (n=42), they were excluded from all but descriptive analyses, leading to a final sample size of 421.
Not applicable.
Wheelchair quality as defined by the Medicare Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System.
We found race differences in many of our variables, but not in quality for manual (odds ratio [OR]=.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], .33-1.36) or power (OR=.82; 95% CI, .51-1.34) wheelchairs. Several factors including age (OR=.96; 95% CI, .93-.99) and income (OR=3.78; 95% CI, 1.43-9.97) were associated with wheelchair quality. There were no significant associations of cultural or psychosocial factors with wheelchair quality.
Although there were no racial differences in wheelchair quality, we found a significant association of older age and lower income with poorer wheelchair quality among Veterans. Efforts are needed to raise awareness of such disparities among VA wheelchair providers and to take steps to eliminate these disparities in prescription practice across VA sites.
评估脊髓损伤(SCI)或截肢(AL)退伍军人的以下情况:(1)按种族划分的患者人口统计学、医学因素、文化和社会心理特征;(2)按种族划分的轮椅质量;(3)患者种族及其他因素与轮椅质量的独立关联。
横断面队列研究。
隶属于学术医疗中心的三个退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗中心。
符合条件的参与者为患有SCI或AL的退伍军人(N = 516);其中482人完成了访谈。分析仅限于白人和非裔美国参与者。由于AL患者(n = 42)的轮椅质量没有差异,因此除描述性分析外,他们被排除在所有分析之外,最终样本量为421。
不适用。
医疗保险医疗通用程序编码系统定义的轮椅质量。
我们发现许多变量存在种族差异,但手动轮椅(优势比[OR]=.67;95%置信区间[CI],.33 - 1.36)或电动轮椅(OR =.82;95% CI,.51 - 1.34)的质量不存在种族差异。包括年龄(OR =.96;95% CI,.93 -.99)和收入(OR = 3.78;95% CI,1.43 - 9.97)在内的几个因素与轮椅质量相关。文化或社会心理因素与轮椅质量无显著关联。
虽然轮椅质量不存在种族差异,但我们发现退伍军人中年龄较大和收入较低与较差的轮椅质量存在显著关联。需要努力提高VA轮椅供应商对这些差异的认识,并采取措施消除VA各站点在处方实践中的这些差异。