Suppr超能文献

丁螺环酮和氯巴占的药效学作用。

Pharmacodynamic effects of buspirone and clobazam.

作者信息

Alford C, Bhatti J Z, Curran S, McKay G, Hindmarch I

机构信息

Human Psychopharmacology Research Unit, Robens Institute of Health and Safety, University of Surrey, Guildford.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1991 Jul;32(1):91-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1991.tb05618.x.

Abstract
  1. The pharmacodynamic effects of buspirone and clobazam were compared in two volunteer studies. Acute doses of buspirone 5 mg, 10 mg and clobazam 10 mg were contrasted with placebo and a verum (lorazepam 1 mg), in a repeated measures design with 10 subjects assessed on a battery of psychometric tests at 1.5, 3.5, and 5.5 h post dose. For the combined results clobazam and the lower dose of buspirone (5 mg) were significantly contrasted with lorazepam on measures of subjective sedation, memory and choice reaction time (CRT). The higher dose of buspirone was not statistically different from lorazepam for all measures except memory; whilst contrasting significantly with placebo and clobazam on movement and total reaction time components respectively. Though failing to achieve significance, a similar trend was seen for critical flicker fusion (CFF) with buspirone 10 mg and lorazepam producing the lowest scores indicative of increased sedation. 2. Repeated doses of buspirone 5 mg twice daily, clobazam 10 mg twice daily, or placebo twice daily for 8 consecutive days were compared on the same battery of psychometric tests in a repeated measures design. Nine subjects were assessed on days 1, 3, and 8 of the study. Overall, memory performance significantly decreased with buspirone 5 mg in contrast to both clobazam and placebo whilst the opposite trend was seen with CFF. Clobazam significantly improved TRT in contrast to both placebo and buspirone. 3. These results indicate improved reaction time and memory performance with repeated dosing of clobazam in contrast to buspirone. Impairment following acute administration of buspirone appears limited to the higher (10 mg) dose.
摘要
  1. 在两项志愿者研究中比较了丁螺环酮和氯巴占的药效学作用。采用重复测量设计,10名受试者在给药后1.5、3.5和5.5小时接受一系列心理测量测试,将丁螺环酮5毫克、10毫克的急性剂量以及氯巴占10毫克与安慰剂和一种对照药(劳拉西泮1毫克)进行对比。综合结果显示,在主观镇静、记忆和选择反应时间(CRT)测量方面,氯巴占和较低剂量的丁螺环酮(5毫克)与劳拉西泮有显著差异。除记忆外,较高剂量的丁螺环酮在所有测量指标上与劳拉西泮无统计学差异;而在运动和总反应时间成分方面分别与安慰剂和氯巴占有显著差异。尽管未达到显著水平,但丁螺环酮10毫克和劳拉西泮在临界闪烁融合(CFF)方面出现了类似趋势,得分最低表明镇静作用增强。2. 在重复测量设计中,对丁螺环酮5毫克每日两次、氯巴占10毫克每日两次或安慰剂每日两次连续服用8天的情况进行了相同系列心理测量测试的比较。9名受试者在研究的第1、3和8天接受评估。总体而言,与氯巴占和安慰剂相比,丁螺环酮5毫克会使记忆表现显著下降,而在CFF方面则出现相反趋势。与安慰剂和丁螺环酮相比,氯巴占显著改善了总反应时间(TRT)。3. 这些结果表明,与丁螺环酮相比,氯巴占重复给药可改善反应时间和记忆表现。丁螺环酮急性给药后的损害似乎仅限于较高(10毫克)剂量。

相似文献

1
Pharmacodynamic effects of buspirone and clobazam.丁螺环酮和氯巴占的药效学作用。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1991 Jul;32(1):91-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1991.tb05618.x.
7
Some aspects of the effects of clobazam on human psychomotor performance.氯巴占对人类精神运动表现影响的某些方面。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):77S-82S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1979.tb04669.x.
8
Oral benzodiazepine premedication in minor gynaecological surgery.
Br J Anaesth. 1984 May;56(5):499-507. doi: 10.1093/bja/56.5.499.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychomotor function and psychoactive drugs.精神运动功能与精神活性药物。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1980 Sep;10(3):189-209. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1980.tb01745.x.
4
Effects of alcohol on buspirone and lorazepam actions.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1982 Aug;32(2):201-7. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1982.148.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验