O'Neill W M, Hanks G W, Simpson P, Fallon M T, Jenkins E, Wesnes K
Department of Palliative Medicine, Bristol Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK.
Pain. 2000 Mar;85(1-2):209-15. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00274-2.
Ten healthy subjects (four male) of mean age 31 years (range 25-40) took part in a randomized double-blind four-way crossover study to examine the cognitive and psychomotor effects of repeated oral doses of dextropropoxyphene and morphine. Four treatments were compared: dextropropoxyphene napsylate 100 mg, morphine sulphate 10 mg, lorazepam 0.5 mg and placebo. Four doses of each drug were given at 4-h intervals to each subject on four separate study days at least 1 week apart. Cognitive function was assessed using choice reaction time, number vigilance, memory scanning, immediate and delayed word recall, word recognition, picture recognition, critical flicker fusion threshold (CFFT) and subjective measures of alertness, calmness and contentment. Lorazepam impaired the speed of responding on all tasks in which speed was recorded (except digit vigilance) and increased subjective ratings of calmness. Morphine had one major effect, which was to increase the accuracy of responding on the choice reaction time task, at every assessment. Morphine produced some sporadic effects in other tests and an increase in subjective calmness. Dextropropoxyphene impaired performance on choice reaction time and picture recognition. These data show that oral morphine may enhance performance in some measures of cognitive function, whereas dextropropoxyphene (in usual therapeutic doses) seems more likely to cause impairment. Neither opioid has substantial effects on cognition and psychomotor function compared with lorazepam.
10名平均年龄为31岁(范围25 - 40岁)的健康受试者(4名男性)参与了一项随机双盲四向交叉研究,以考察重复口服右丙氧芬和吗啡对认知及精神运动功能的影响。比较了四种治疗方法:萘磺酸右丙氧芬100毫克、硫酸吗啡10毫克、劳拉西泮0.5毫克和安慰剂。在至少相隔1周的四个不同研究日,每隔4小时给每位受试者服用每种药物的四个剂量。使用选择反应时间、数字警觉性、记忆扫描、即时和延迟单词回忆、单词识别、图片识别、临界闪烁融合阈值(CFFT)以及警觉性、平静度和满足感的主观测量指标来评估认知功能。劳拉西泮在所有记录速度的任务中(数字警觉性除外)均降低了反应速度,并提高了平静度的主观评分。吗啡有一个主要作用,即在每次评估时都能提高选择反应时间任务中的反应准确性。吗啡在其他测试中产生了一些零星的影响,并增加了主观平静度。右丙氧芬在选择反应时间和图片识别方面损害了表现。这些数据表明,口服吗啡可能在某些认知功能测量指标上提高表现,而右丙氧芬(在常用治疗剂量下)似乎更有可能导致损害。与劳拉西泮相比,这两种阿片类药物对认知和精神运动功能均无实质性影响。