• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生服务机构在产前护理上花费了多少时间?对在坦桑尼亚引入重点产前护理模式的影响。

How much time do health services spend on antenatal care? Implications for the introduction of the focused antenatal care model in Tanzania.

作者信息

von Both Claudia, Flessa Steffen, Makuwani Ahmad, Mpembeni Rose, Jahn Albrecht

机构信息

Department of Tropical Hygiene and Public Health, Ruprecht-Karls-University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006 Jun 23;6:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-6-22.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-6-22
PMID:16796749
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1557863/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antenatal care (ANC) is a widely used strategy to improve the health of pregnant women and to encourage skilled care during childbirth. In 2002, the Ministry of Health of the United Republic of Tanzania developed a national adaptation plan based on the new model of the World Health Organisation (WHO). In this study we assess the time health workers currently spent on providing ANC services and compare it to the requirements anticipated for the new ANC model in order to identify the implications of Focused ANC on health care providers' workload.

METHODS

Health workers in four dispensaries in Mtwara Urban District, Southern Tanzania, were observed while providing routine ANC. The time used for the overall activity as well as for the different, specific components of 71 ANC service provisions was measured in detail; 28 of these were first visits and 43 revisits. Standard time requirements for the provision of focused ANC were assessed through simulated consultations based on the new guidelines.

RESULTS

The average time health workers currently spend for providing ANC service to a first visit client was found to be 15 minutes; the provision of ANC according to the focused ANC model was assessed to be 46 minutes. For a revisiting client the difference between current practise and the anticipated standard of the new model was 27 minutes (9 vs. 36 min.). The major discrepancy between the two procedures was related to counselling. On average a first visit client was counselled for 1:30 minutes, while counselling in revisiting clients did hardly take place at all. The simulation of focused ANC revealed that proper counselling would take about 15 minutes per visit.

CONCLUSION

While the introduction of focused ANC has the potential to improve the health of pregnant women and to raise the number of births attended by skilled staff in Tanzania, it may need additional investment in human resources. The generally anticipated saving effect of the new model through the reduction of routine consultations may not materialise because the number of consultations is already low in Tanzania with a median of only 4 visits per pregnancy. Special attention needs to be given to counselling attitudes and skills during the training for Focused ANC as this component is identified as the major difference between old practise and the new model. Our estimated requirement of 46 minutes per first visit consultation matches well with the WHO estimate of 40 minutes.

摘要

背景

产前保健(ANC)是一种广泛应用的策略,旨在改善孕妇健康状况并鼓励分娩时获得专业护理。2002年,坦桑尼亚联合共和国卫生部基于世界卫生组织(WHO)的新模式制定了一项国家适应计划。在本研究中,我们评估了卫生工作者目前提供产前保健服务所花费的时间,并将其与新的产前保健模式预期所需时间进行比较,以确定集中式产前保健对医疗服务提供者工作量的影响。

方法

在坦桑尼亚南部姆特瓦拉市区的四个诊疗所观察卫生工作者提供常规产前保健的情况。详细测量了71次产前保健服务的整体活动以及不同具体组成部分所花费的时间;其中28次为首次就诊,43次为复诊。通过基于新指南的模拟咨询评估了提供集中式产前保健的标准时间要求。

结果

发现卫生工作者目前为首次就诊客户提供产前保健服务的平均时间为15分钟;根据集中式产前保健模式提供服务的时间评估为46分钟。对于复诊客户,当前做法与新模式预期标准之间的差异为27分钟(9分钟对36分钟)。两种程序的主要差异与咨询有关。首次就诊客户平均接受咨询1.5分钟,而复诊客户几乎没有接受咨询。集中式产前保健的模拟显示,每次就诊适当的咨询时间约为15分钟。

结论

虽然引入集中式产前保健有可能改善坦桑尼亚孕妇的健康状况并增加由专业人员接生的分娩数量,但可能需要在人力资源方面进行额外投资。新模式通过减少常规咨询通常预期的节省效果可能无法实现,因为坦桑尼亚的咨询次数本来就少,每次怀孕的中位数仅为4次就诊。在集中式产前保健培训期间,需要特别关注咨询态度和技能,因为这一组成部分被确定为旧做法与新模式之间的主要差异。我们估计每次首次就诊咨询需要46分钟,这与世界卫生组织估计的40分钟非常吻合。

相似文献

1
How much time do health services spend on antenatal care? Implications for the introduction of the focused antenatal care model in Tanzania.卫生服务机构在产前护理上花费了多少时间?对在坦桑尼亚引入重点产前护理模式的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2006 Jun 23;6:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-6-22.
2
Provision of inadequate information on postnatal care and services during antenatal visits in Busega, Northwest Tanzania: a simulated client study.在坦桑尼亚西北部布塞加,产妇产前检查时提供的产后护理和服务信息不足:一项模拟客户研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 25;22(1):700. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08071-6.
3
The effect of national antenatal care guidelines and provider training on obstetric danger sign counselling: a propensity score matching analysis of the 2014 Ethiopia service provision assessment plus survey.国家产前保健指南和提供者培训对产科危险信号咨询的影响:基于 2014 年埃塞俄比亚服务提供评估加调查的倾向评分匹配分析。
Reprod Health. 2022 Jun 6;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01442-6.
4
A qualitative exploration of health workers' and clients' perceptions of barriers to completing four antenatal care visits in Morogoro Region, Tanzania.对坦桑尼亚莫罗戈罗地区卫生工作者和客户关于完成四次产前检查的障碍认知的定性探索。
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Oct;31(8):1039-49. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw034. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
5
Efficiency of antenatal care and childbirth services in selected primary health care facilities in rural Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.坦桑尼亚农村部分初级卫生保健机构的产前护理和分娩服务效率:一项横断面研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 28;14:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-96.
6
Implementing standard antenatal care interventions: health system cost at primary health facilities in Tanzania.实施标准产前护理干预措施:坦桑尼亚初级卫生保健机构的卫生系统成本
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Dec 7;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00325-0.
7
How much time is available for antenatal care consultations? Assessment of the quality of care in rural Tanzania.产前护理咨询有多少时间可用?坦桑尼亚农村地区护理质量评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Sep 24;11:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-64.
8
Compliance with focused antenatal care services: do health workers in rural Burkina Faso, Uganda and Tanzania perform all ANC procedures?遵守集中产前护理服务:布基纳法索、乌干达和坦桑尼亚的农村卫生工作者是否执行所有 ANC 程序?
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Mar;17(3):300-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02923.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
9
Continuum of maternity care among rural women in Ethiopia: does place and frequency of antenatal care visit matter?埃塞俄比亚农村妇女的连续孕产护理:产前护理的地点和频率是否重要?
Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 6;18(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01265-x.
10
Effect of a new antenatal care programme on the attitudes of pregnant women and midwives towards antenatal care in Harare.一项新的产前护理计划对哈拉雷孕妇和助产士产前护理态度的影响。
Cent Afr J Med. 1997 May;43(5):131-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing time requirements of two models of SARS-CoV-2 screening and testing in routine healthcare services in Kenya and Cameroon: a descriptive study.评估肯尼亚和喀麦隆常规医疗服务中两种新型冠状病毒筛查和检测模型的时间要求:一项描述性研究。
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Mar 22;2(Suppl 1):e001154. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001154. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Group antenatal care positively transforms the care experience: Results of an effectiveness trial in Malawi.群体产前护理积极改变护理体验:马拉维一项有效性试验的结果
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0317171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317171. eCollection 2025.
3
Effect of nutrition behavior change communication on nutrition knowledge and dietary practices of pregnant adolescents in West Arsi, Central Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.营养行为改变沟通对埃塞俄比亚中部西阿尔西地区青少年孕妇营养知识和饮食习惯的影响:一项整群随机对照试验
Front Nutr. 2025 Mar 27;12:1541415. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1541415. eCollection 2025.
4
Providers' Practices and Associated Factors in Educating Pregnant Women on the Prevention of Maternal Anemia During Antenatal Care Visits in Ujiji Municipality, Kigoma Region, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚基戈马地区乌吉吉市产前检查期间医护人员在对孕妇进行预防孕产妇贫血教育方面的做法及相关因素
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 5;13(3):327. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030327.
5
Effect of Group Antenatal Care on Breastfeeding Knowledge and Practices Among Pregnant Women in Ghana: Findings from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.群组产前护理对加纳孕妇母乳喂养知识及实践的影响:一项整群随机对照试验的结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 28;21(12):1587. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121587.
6
Use of a digital job-aid in improving antenatal clinical protocols and quality of care in rural primary-level health facilities in Burkina Faso: a quasi-experimental evaluation.数字辅助工具在改善布基纳法索农村基层卫生机构产前临床方案和护理质量中的应用:一项准实验评估。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 27;13(9):e074770. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074770.
7
The effectiveness of interactive mobile health technologies in improving antenatal care service utilization in Dodoma region, Tanzania: A quasi-Experimental study.交互式移动健康技术在改善坦桑尼亚多多马地区产前护理服务利用方面的效果:一项准实验研究。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Aug 16;2(8):e0000321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000321. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Experiential Training Workshops for Group Antenatal Care in Malawi.马拉维小组产前护理体验式培训研讨会。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2022 Nov;67(6):759-769. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13436. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
9
Implementing standard antenatal care interventions: health system cost at primary health facilities in Tanzania.实施标准产前护理干预措施:坦桑尼亚初级卫生保健机构的卫生系统成本
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Dec 7;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00325-0.
10
Enhancing nutrition knowledge and dietary diversity among rural pregnant women in Malawi: a randomized controlled trial.提高马拉维农村孕妇的营养知识和饮食多样性:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Sep 22;21(1):644. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04117-5.

本文引用的文献

1
The World Health Report 2005: "make every mother and child count" - including Africans.《2005年世界卫生报告》:“重视每一位母亲和儿童”——包括非洲人。
Scand J Public Health. 2005;33(6):409-11. doi: 10.1080/14034940500217037.
2
Womens' opinions on antenatal care in developing countries: results of a study in Cuba, Thailand, Saudi Arabia and Argentina.发展中国家女性对产前护理的看法:古巴、泰国、沙特阿拉伯和阿根廷的一项研究结果。
BMC Public Health. 2003 May 20;3:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-3-17.
3
A framework for a new approach to antenatal care.一种新的产前护理方法的框架。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003 Feb;80(2):175-82. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00331-4.
4
Can mothers afford maternal health care costs? User costs of maternity services in rural Tanzania.母亲们能否承担孕产妇保健费用?坦桑尼亚农村地区的孕产妇服务使用者费用。
Afr J Reprod Health. 2002 Apr;6(1):65-73.
5
Are women and providers satisfied with antenatal care? Views on a standard and a simplified, evidence-based model of care in four developing countries.女性和医疗服务提供者对产前护理是否满意?四个发展中国家对标准和简化的循证护理模式的看法。
BMC Womens Health. 2002 Jul 19;2(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-2-7.
6
Effective provision of antenatal care.有效提供产前护理。
Lancet. 2001 Sep 15;358(9285):928. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06062-7.
7
WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care.世界卫生组织用于评估新型常规产前保健模式的产前保健随机试验。
Lancet. 2001 May 19;357(9268):1551-64. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04722-x.
8
Rationalisation of antenatal care.产前护理的合理化
Lancet. 2001 May 19;357(9268):1546. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04777-2.
9
Why do at-risk mothers fail to reach referral level? Barriers beyond distance and cost.为什么高危母亲未能达到转诊标准?距离和成本之外的障碍。
Afr J Reprod Health. 2000 Apr;4(1):100-9.