Alonso de Leciñana María, Gutiérrez María, Roda Jose María, Carceller Fernando, Díez-Tejedor Exuperio
Cerebrovascular Research Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
J Neurol Sci. 2006 Sep 25;247(2):121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2006.03.022. Epub 2006 Jun 22.
An approach combining reperfusion mediated by thrombolytics with pharmacological neuroprotection aimed at inhibiting the physiopathological disorders responsible for ischemia-reperfusion damage, could provide an optimal treatment of ischemic stroke. We investigate, in a rat embolic stroke model, the combination of rtPA with citicoline as compared to either alone as monotherapy, and whether the neuroprotector should be provided before or after thrombolysis to achieve a greater reduction of ischemic brain damage. One hundred and nine rats have been studied: four were sham-operated and the rest embolized in the right internal carotid artery with an autologous clot and divided among 5 groups: 1) control; 2) iv rtPA 5 mg/kg 30 min post-embolization 3) citicoline 250 mg/kg ip x3 doses, 10 min, 24 h and 48 h post-embolization; 4) citicoline combined with rtPA following the same pattern; 5) rtPA combined with citicoline, with a first dose 10 min after thrombolysis. Mortality, neurological score, volume of ischemic lesion and neuronal death (TUNEL) after 72 h and plasma levels of IL-6 and TNF-alpha, were considered to assess ischemic brain damage. Compared with controls, the use of citicoline after thrombolysis produced the greatest reduction of mortality caused by the ischemic lesion (p<0.01), infarct volume (p=0.027), number of TUNEL positive cells in striatum (p=0.014) and plasma levels of TNF-alpha at 3 h (p=0.027) and 72 h (p=0.011). rtPA induced reperfusion provided a slight non-significant reduction of infarct volume and neuronal death, but it reduced mortality due to brain damage (p<0.01) although an increase in the risk of fatal bleeding was noted. CiT as monotherapy only produced a significant reduction of neuronal death in striatum (p=0.014). The combination of CiT before rtPA did not add any benefit to rtPA alone. The superiority of the combined treatment with rtPA followed by citicoline suggests that early reperfusion should be followed by effective neuroprotection to inhibit ischemia-reperfusion injury and better protect the tissue at risk.
一种将溶栓剂介导的再灌注与旨在抑制缺血再灌注损伤相关病理生理紊乱的药理学神经保护相结合的方法,可能为缺血性中风提供最佳治疗。我们在大鼠栓塞性中风模型中,研究了重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rtPA)与胞磷胆碱联合使用相对于单独作为单一疗法的效果,以及神经保护剂应在溶栓前还是溶栓后使用,以更大程度地减少缺血性脑损伤。我们研究了109只大鼠:4只进行假手术,其余大鼠通过自体血凝块栓塞右侧颈内动脉,并分为5组:1)对照组;2)栓塞后30分钟静脉注射rtPA 5mg/kg;3)栓塞后10分钟、24小时和48小时腹腔注射胞磷胆碱250mg/kg,共3次;4)按照相同模式联合使用胞磷胆碱和rtPA;5)rtPA联合胞磷胆碱,在溶栓后10分钟给予首剂。通过72小时后的死亡率、神经功能评分、缺血性病变体积和神经元死亡(TUNEL法)以及血浆白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平,来评估缺血性脑损伤。与对照组相比,溶栓后使用胞磷胆碱可最大程度降低缺血性病变导致的死亡率(p<0.01)、梗死体积(p=0.027)、纹状体中TUNEL阳性细胞数量(p=0.014)以及3小时(p=0.027)和72小时(p=0.011)时的血浆TNF-α水平。rtPA诱导的再灌注使梗死体积和神经元死亡略有减少,但差异无统计学意义,不过它降低了脑损伤导致的死亡率(p<且0.01),尽管注意到致命性出血风险增加。胞磷胆碱作为单一疗法仅使纹状体中的神经元死亡显著减少(p=0.014)。在rtPA之前联合使用胞磷胆碱并未给单独使用rtPA带来任何益处。rtPA后联合使用胞磷胆碱的联合治疗的优势表明,早期再灌注后应进行有效的神经保护,以抑制缺血再灌注损伤并更好地保护危险组织。