Suppr超能文献

手动刀与电动取皮刀:当前观点、实践及证据

Hand knife versus powered dermatome: current opinions, practices, and evidence.

作者信息

Tehrani Hamid, Lindford Andrew, Logan Andrew M

机构信息

Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, England.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Jul;57(1):77-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000214902.79193.4e.

Abstract

Some surgeons prefer to use powered dermatomes when harvesting split-thickness skin grafts, while others prefer the hand knife. We conducted a postal survey of British plastic surgery units, contacted medicolegal departments, and investigated the literature to explore the reasoning for any preferences and the existing evidence to support such practices. Two hundred thirty-eight surgeons from 30 units replied, 145 (61%) preferring to use the powered dermatome, primarily as they believed it provided for better-quality graft and donor sites. Ninety-five (40%) respondents felt they were potentially open to successful litigation by using a hand knife when a powered dermatome was available. We found no evidence to support such clinical or medicolegal views and conclude that numerous misconceptions exist about skin-graft harvesting instruments. We suggest that surgeons should use whichever instrument they feel will, in their hands, provide the optimum result and not be directed by unfounded opinions.

摘要

一些外科医生在切取中厚皮片时更喜欢使用电动取皮刀,而另一些则更喜欢手动刀。我们对英国的整形外科科室进行了邮寄调查,联系了法医学部门,并查阅了文献,以探究产生任何偏好的原因以及支持此类做法的现有证据。来自30个科室的238名外科医生进行了回复,145名(61%)更喜欢使用电动取皮刀,主要是因为他们认为电动取皮刀能提供质量更好的皮片和供区。95名(40%)受访者认为,在有电动取皮刀的情况下使用手动刀可能会面临成功的诉讼。我们没有找到支持此类临床或法医学观点的证据,并得出结论,关于皮片切取器械存在许多误解。我们建议外科医生应使用他们认为在自己手中能提供最佳效果的器械,而不应受毫无根据的观点的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验