Suppr超能文献

腰椎手术中不同拔管技术的比较:俯卧位拔管与仰卧位拔管(有无预先注射静脉利多卡因)

Comparison of different extubation techniques in lumbar surgery: prone extubation versus supine extubation with or without prior injection of intravenous lidocaine.

作者信息

Yörükoğlu Dilek, Alanoğlu Zekeriyya, Dilek Ufuk Bülent, Can Ozlem Selvi, Keçik Yüksel

机构信息

Ankara University Medical Faculty Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Turkey.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2006 Jul;18(3):165-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ana.0000204535.25501.c5.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of coughing and breath holding in patients undergoing lumbar surgery extubated in prone position, supine position, or supine position with intravenous lidocaine before extubation. About 105 ASA I to II patients undergoing lumbar surgery were extubated in prone position in group P (n = 35), in supine position in group S (n = 35) and in supine position with intravenous 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine 10 minutes before extubation in group SL (n = 35). The number of patients who coughed and demonstrated breath holding was noted at emergence period. The time of loss of monitoring while repositioning the patient was recorded. The frequency of cough in group S was higher compared with group P at 1 minute after extubation (P = 0.008). Two and three minutes after extubation, the patients in group S demonstrated higher cough incidence compared with groups P and SL (P < 0.05). The incidence of breath holding in the first 6 minutes was lower in group P (n = 11) compared with groups S (n = 29) and SL (n = 25)(P = 0.001). The loss of monitoring time was longer in groups S (62 +/- 40 s) and SL (53 +/- 39 s) when compared with group P (0 s) (P < 0.01). Prone emergence and supine emergence with intravenous lidocaine provides an alternative approach to conventional supine emergence and prone extubation offers less cough and breath holding and continuation of monitoring.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估在俯卧位、仰卧位或拔管前静脉注射利多卡因的仰卧位下行腰椎手术的患者拔管时咳嗽和屏气的发生率。约105例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I至II级的腰椎手术患者,P组(n = 35)在俯卧位拔管,S组(n = 35)在仰卧位拔管,SL组(n = 35)在拔管前10分钟静脉注射1.5 mg/kg利多卡因后在仰卧位拔管。记录患者在苏醒期咳嗽和屏气的人数。记录患者重新摆放体位时监测中断的时间。拔管后1分钟时,S组咳嗽频率高于P组(P = 0.008)。拔管后2分钟和3分钟时,S组患者咳嗽发生率高于P组和SL组(P < 0.05)。P组(n = 11)在最初6分钟内屏气发生率低于S组(n = 29)和SL组(n = 25)(P = 0.001)。与P组(0秒)相比,S组(62±40秒)和SL组(53±39秒)的监测中断时间更长(P < 0.01)。俯卧位苏醒以及静脉注射利多卡因后的仰卧位苏醒为传统仰卧位苏醒提供了一种替代方法,俯卧位拔管咳嗽和屏气较少,且能持续监测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验