Löwe Bernd, Henningsen Peter, Herzog Wolfgang
Klinik für Psychosomatische und Aligemeine Klinische Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg.
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2006 Mar-Apr;56(3-4):182-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-915463.
Severe psychological responses to war and violence were already described in Greek antiquity. However, an officially acknowledged diagnosis was introduced only as recently as 1980. This paper describes the historical development of the diagnosis "Posttraumatic Stress Disorder", and investigates why it took so long for the diagnosis to be officially accepted. A first concept goes back to the London Surgeon Eric Erichsen, who in 1866 developed the influential hypotheses that psychological symptoms after railway accidents were caused by a concussion of the spine followed by "molecular changes" in the spinal cord ("railway spine syndrome"). At the same time, Pierre Janet and Sigmund Freud investigated the aetiology of hysteria. In World War I and II, up to 10% of the soldiers were exempted from further service because they suffered from nervous breakdowns caused by the experience of war ("shell shock"). Insights into the psychological long-term effects of Nazi Germany's concentration camps, the political activities of the Vietnam Veterans, and evidence from clinical studies resulted in the introduction of the newly defined diagnosis "Post-traumatic Stress Disorder" into DSM-III in 1980. In the past few years, several aspects of this diagnostic concept were legitimately criticized. Nevertheless, the official introduction of the diagnosis led to the acknowledgement of personal suffering and to the development of specific and efficacious therapies.
对战争和暴力的严重心理反应在古希腊时期就已被描述。然而,直到1980年才正式引入了这一被认可的诊断。本文描述了“创伤后应激障碍”这一诊断的历史发展,并探究为何这一诊断经过了如此长的时间才被正式接受。第一个相关概念可追溯到伦敦外科医生埃里克·埃里克森,他在1866年提出了具有影响力的假说,即铁路事故后的心理症状是由脊柱震荡继而脊髓发生“分子变化”所致(“铁路脊椎综合征”)。与此同时,皮埃尔·雅内和西格蒙德·弗洛伊德对癔症的病因进行了研究。在第一次世界大战和第二次世界大战期间,高达10%的士兵因战争经历导致精神崩溃(“炮弹休克症”)而被免除继续服役。对纳粹德国集中营心理长期影响的深入了解、越南退伍军人的政治活动以及临床研究的证据,促使1980年新定义的“创伤后应激障碍”诊断被引入《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)。在过去几年中,这一诊断概念的几个方面受到了合理批评。尽管如此,该诊断的正式引入使得个人痛苦得到了承认,并推动了特定有效疗法的发展。