Suppr超能文献

对面包和酒精强化的反对意见的反复历史:从铁屑到叶酸。

The repeating history of objections to the fortification of bread and alcohol: from iron filings to folic acid.

作者信息

Kamien Max

机构信息

Discipline of General Practice, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2006 Jun 19;184(12):638-40. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00422.x.

Abstract

The fortification of staple foods has eliminated many deficiency diseases. Despite this, "tampering" with people's food always provokes opposition, much of it from health professionals. Opposition is often based on self-interest, tunnel vision and theory rather than research. A historical perspective of the patterns of objections to fortification and its outcomes may help resolve the anxieties and opposing ethical positions of advocates and opponents of fortification.

摘要

主食的强化消除了许多营养缺乏疾病。尽管如此,“干预”人们的食物总是会引发反对,其中大部分反对来自健康专家。反对往往基于自身利益、狭隘的观点和理论而非研究。从历史角度审视对强化的反对模式及其结果,可能有助于化解强化倡导者和反对者的焦虑及相互对立的伦理立场。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验