Kwong Myron S, Chung Gina G, Horvath Laura J, Ward Barbara A, Hsu Arlene D, Carter Darryl, Tavassoli Fatteneh, Haffty Bruce, Burtness Barbara A
Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.
Cancer J. 2006 May-Jun;12(3):212-21. doi: 10.1097/00130404-200605000-00010.
The utility of breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not well defined. We compared serial magnetic resonance imaging examinations with histologic posttreatment examinations in patients treated with primary chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.
Eligible patients with locally advanced breast cancer received doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) (with granulocyte colony stimulating factor support) every 14 days for a maximum of six cycles. Breast magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline and repeated every two cycles. Surgery (either local excision or mastectomy) was performed after six cycles in responding or stable patients. Residual tumor size on pathology and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was compared; concordance was defined as a < or = 0.5-cm difference.
To date, three of 17 enrolled subjects (17.6%) attained pathologic complete response, and three additional patients attained near pathologic complete response, with residual foci of < or = 1 mm. Of these six patients, only one was disease-free by magnetic resonance imaging. Discordance between magnetic resonance imaging findings and pathologic evaluation was found in four of six patients (66.6%) who obtained pathologic complete response or near pathologic complete response. In the three patients in whom four axillary lesions were followed with magnetic resonance imaging, discordance was found in all four lesions, with magnetic resonance imaging overestimating pathologic disease in all cases.
Our findings caution that magnetic resonance imaging may frequently overestimate residual invasive carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These results contradict previous studies suggesting that postchemotherapy magnetic resonance imaging may underestimate residual cancer. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating response to therapy in locally advanced breast cancer should be further studied.
在接受新辅助化疗的患者中,乳腺磁共振成像的效用尚未明确界定。我们比较了接受原发性化疗治疗局部晚期乳腺癌患者的系列磁共振成像检查结果与治疗后的组织学检查结果。
符合条件的局部晚期乳腺癌患者每14天接受一次60mg/m²阿霉素和60mg/m²多西他赛治疗(给予粒细胞集落刺激因子支持),最多六个周期。在基线时进行乳腺磁共振成像检查,每两个周期重复一次。对病情缓解或稳定的患者在六个周期后进行手术(局部切除或乳房切除术)。比较病理上的残留肿瘤大小与术前磁共振成像结果;一致性定义为差异≤0.5cm。
迄今为止,17名入组受试者中有3名(17.6%)达到病理完全缓解,另有3名患者达到接近病理完全缓解,残留病灶≤1mm。在这6名患者中,只有1名通过磁共振成像显示无疾病。在获得病理完全缓解或接近病理完全缓解的6名患者中,有4名(66.6%)的磁共振成像结果与病理评估不一致。在3名对4个腋窝病变进行磁共振成像随访的患者中,所有4个病变均发现不一致,磁共振成像在所有病例中均高估了病理疾病。
我们的研究结果提醒,磁共振成像可能经常高估新辅助化疗后残留浸润性癌的情况。这些结果与之前的研究结果相反,之前的研究表明化疗后磁共振成像可能低估残留癌症。在评估局部晚期乳腺癌对治疗的反应中使用磁共振成像应进一步研究。